brockmyster Posted 21 September 2012 Posted 21 September 2012 What is everyones obession with this? People want to drop Konchesky to play a young striker at left back i just dont get it anyone care to explain?
Jimmy Posted 21 September 2012 Posted 21 September 2012 What is everyones obession with this? People want to drop Konchesky to play a young striker at left back i just dont get it anyone care to explain? because Konchesky's form has been absolute shite this season and Schlupp is our only other option, if Kennedy were still here people would be saying play him instead
stevelcfc Posted 21 September 2012 Posted 21 September 2012 Konch has been shit, schlupp can play left back- and quite well from what I have seen - explanation over.
cc_star Posted 21 September 2012 Posted 21 September 2012 What is everyones obession with this? People want to drop Konchesky to play a young striker at left back i just dont get it anyone care to explain? Konchesky has been utter turd for 6 games out of 7 & average in the other one. Schlupp could offer meaningful Naughton style energy up & down the left side.
Deucalion Posted 21 September 2012 Posted 21 September 2012 I thought Konchesky was a lot better on Wednesday night. Anyone see when he outpaced Dyer late in the second half? I have to admit I'm more excited by Schlupp as a left back than as a striker. He's not developed as we all hoped up front and Konchesky will need replacing in the near future in my opinion.
Jimmy Posted 21 September 2012 Posted 21 September 2012 I thought Konchesky was a lot better on Wednesday night. Anyone see when he outpaced Dyer late in the second half? I have to admit I'm more excited by Schlupp as a left back than as a striker. He's not developed as we all hoped up front and Konchesky will need replacing in the near future in my opinion. if he'd played more then 10 games up there then fair enough but he hasn't
Rich Fox Posted 21 September 2012 Posted 21 September 2012 Konchesky doesn't need replacing. He is so over rated I dread to think what money he is on. Maybe someone can enlighten me.
LCFC_FAN_1995 Posted 21 September 2012 Posted 21 September 2012 What is everyones obession with this? People want to drop Konchesky to play a young striker at left back i just dont get it anyone care to explain? Gets outpaced too many times and has been awful this season, Schlupp looks alright at LB, but we need to loan one a.s.a.p.
marty78 Posted 22 September 2012 Posted 22 September 2012 What is everyones obession with this? People want to drop Konchesky to play a young striker at left back i just dont get it anyone care to explain? The lack of replies to the topic does suggest it is hardly an obsession but I for one would like to see Schlupp at left back at some stage this season, at least to have a better look at him there. I don't see why people find the idea strange.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.