Should Pearson Go? - The Poll

[Captain...]

This......prove a point pearsonites dont like it? Back pearson,com says it all.

History facts never wrong. Back pearson all you like fact remains leicesters worst ever premier league manager if that's talking shit in your words then you my friend are deluded.

Oh you forgot to add in Ferdinand, Howey, keown all premier league experienced players.

You've not proved anything, Adams had a team full of premier league experience including those players I mentioned that were so successful for the club.

I am pretty confident that 1994/95 will still be our worst season in the premier league, but why bother, I just don't understand this need to make shit up, Pearson's record speaks for itself, not good enough, so why try and make it look worse by comparing it to Adams who had a premier league squad to work with.

[Babylon]

Adams had Izzett Eliot Taggart Sinclair prem experience in the squad and all round the club, comparing the 2 is nonsense. Having more money than Adams did means nothing when the premier league is 10 times richer.

Pearson is failing no doubt about it, but I do get fed up with people talking shit just to prove a point that nobody disagrees with.[/quot

This......prove a point pearsonites dont like it? Back pearson,com says it all.

History facts never wrong. Back pearson all you like fact remains leicesters worst ever premier league manager if that's talking shit in your words then you my friend are deluded.

Sigh... do we have to go through this shit again. We've quite clearly had worse, like the ones who have taken established teams and ruined them. Attempting to compare on stats alone is just stupid, just as it is when people trot out "Pearson's our second best manager" on the back of good stats in the champ and league one.

[Lichfieldfox.]

Pretty poor poll tbh, full of bias and speculation.