Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
I believe this point of view has cropped up here before, and I think the rebuttal remains the same.
If the style of playing change gets this team to push on and do better than they're doing now, fair enough. But those pining for older styles might be reminded that this Test team won one Test in 17 before this style of play was implemented.
East Asia come summertime is utterly awful in that regard. Air conditioning is a necessity over there.
The UK is on the trajectory to be similar. Soon.
Coral skeletons and pollen remains, to name two more.
And on the contrary, all of those sources provide a great deal of data that shows both historical temperature levels and air chemical composition very clearly.
I absolutely agree that the recognition and action on this matter needs to be global. However, the first article shows rather clearly that those certain Western figures are about as much use in that regard as a chocolate fireguard.
On the main topic of emissions and commensurate temperature increase, thankfully quite a few sources supply a wealth of information going back at least that far.
Changes in temperature that cause tree ring effects are, in part, caused by emissions that then reach and effect the stratosphere. It does therefore give more information on a small part of the puzzle.
Already looks like the only two positive outcomes for England here are winning by batting once and racking up a truly monster total, or at least matching the first innings total and rolling on to the draw.
On topic: tree rings can also tell us about emissions that have made it to the stratosphere through the aforementioned temperature variables, thus providing a solid (though limited in its own way indirect) method.
It's a fair argument. I guess we'll find out what subsequent studies show.
In any case, I think the impact human activity has had on various emissions and the biosphere since the Industrial Revolution is really not in question.
I think as long as you have legit records to draw from, using models that apply them is OK.
And yes, it's obvious that the more scientific agencies doing good work stay out the way of the death-worshipping fundies, the better.
Probably not, unless something happens that either completely removes Trump from play or he somehow manages to neutralise the cult of personality around him.
https://phys.org/news/2025-06-human-stratospheric-cooling-early.amp
More (rather darkly) fascinating stuff from Phys.org. It really is a great resource for information on this topic.
You'd think at least one match wouldn't have enough play for that three days over the course of an English summer, yeah.
So 3-1 England or possibly 2-2.