Scotch

Sounds almost identical to Rodgers.

You're not prepared for that answer.

Carrick and Gerard would be my shout.

They can't take loans if they don't have money to pay it back. Fans are a big source of that money. Top cared enough to print a page or two in the matchday programme but not enough to actually change ANYTHING. As people who ACTUALLY care, I'm sure you would agree, that isn't enough. I'm sure you do go to support the lads and thats how it should be but the reality of it is that, THAT support, benefits KP and as long as there is a benefit to be here, they will be. No fans would hurt the club. You are right but I suppose the better question is, is it better that WE hurt the club for a year or two or THEY hurt the club for the next DECADE or two and to be quite honest, even with the fans, there is no guarantee that we don't go the same way as SW anyway. KP sure are showing signs of leading us that way and if we don't see a change, either in ownership of how they run us, it's likely it will. We need to FORCE change! If we keep doing the same thing over and over, so will they and neither is working.

Although I don't agree with name calling because he doesn't agree with your way of doing things, do you really think that KP care WHY you are paying hem thousands of pounds a year to show up? Do you really think that they care that you are audibly disgruntled with them as long as you keep paying them? You asked why you should stop doing what you're doing. What you are doing is what is keeping them here. 2 PSR breaches and 2 relegations in 3 years isn't enough to make them care, why would some sweary words from the people who are lining their pockets? Them sitting in an empty stadium every other week while thousands stand outside the stadium calling them sweary words.... thats more likely to get their attention.

I'm a Scotland fan. I like him. He seems like a good lad with a good attitude. I like that he's from Leicester and I think would care about the club. He works hard and contributes to play as a whole. But.... He's just not a natural goalscorer and we would not be able to rely on him for goals.

I've said it once and I'll say it again, the people that we are interviewing aren't the issue. The REAL issue is who is doing the interviews. Top is clueless and relies on Rudkin to run his club. Rudkin is clueless and relies on Top to employ him because no one else is stupid enough to let him anywhere near their football club. It really doesn't matter who our manager is and I refuse to get angry about it. I'm too busy being angry about the sheer incompetence of those in charge of our club and the blatant lack of accountability that they are being held to. I fcuking hate that I love this football club.

In that case... we are up to our nutsacks in good news!

That would make sense if we had someone lined up that we wanted in immediately but there wouldn't be much point in failing "by a little bit more" if we could just wait 5 days when we knew we wouldn't have anyone in anyway. It's just strange. We had two options and didn't pick any of them.

We kept Ruud on for over a month and sacked him 5 days before the new financial year.... not making sense is our jam.

Clearly the OP is on the wind up. He cut the lads hair who was back home visiting and is running with it. That would be my guess.

You can't post there..... out of embarrassment or....??? Just kidding man. I couldn't really care less, if you are in the know or not. It will or won't happen and the rest is just what it is.

I agree, £20m would be my cut off as well.

He's a class GK but I'd sell him in a heartbeat if it meant having cash to get one or two decent strikers. Weaken one position to benefit the team as a whole.

I highly doubt Birmingham will be signing any more strikers. They have Stansfield, Dykes, May and have just signed Kyogo. Tyler Roberts there as well.

I have no problem at all with Rohl coming in and getting poached in a year. Not only does that mean that he's done a good job and we will get payment for him leaving but it will also mean that he leaves us in a better position than we are now, making is a more attractive proposition for a replacement.

I don't see anything in the Che Adams pic. He's a Leicester lad, I imagine he's home visiting before going back to Italy. If he were to sign, I wouldn't be too keen on it. He's not a natural goalscorer and would cost a decent amount for what he is.

Awesome. A rich family, headed by a son, living off his dad's name who fans feel doesn't communicate well, is out of touch with the fan base and makes poor business decisions! Something new and exciting!!

Obviously, it is exciting seing some of these young players coming through but it's important to remember that a lot of these lads are 16/17 and putting the pressure of expecting them to contribute over an entire season in a promotion challenge would be unfair to them and potentially harmful to their development.

It IS a big day for some of those players. The likes of Goldong, Cartright, Marcal etc. It's their chance to show that we might not need to sign someone for that position and they can contribute to the squad this year as opposed to be punted out on loan.

I don't see many of that lot leaving.

In the grand scale of things, playing in training gear isn't too much to worry about but it does give off a 'doing PE in trousers and a Polo because we forgot our gym clothes' vibe.

There are probably about 8 players in that starting line-up who could reasonably expect to start in our first game.

I've wondered that myself.