Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

FoxinNotts

Member
  • Posts

    9,149
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by FoxinNotts

  1. I know mate. it was sarcasm. So many people spouting the same question!
  2. Let's just recall Thomas and Kristiensen?
  3. I agree with you re Winks and Hermansen. And I also agree on the bed wetters The main point for me is over reliance on Ricardo and Justin. These two will get injured at some point. They are made of Chip sticks.
  4. Loads of cover @jayfox26 @JimJams Straight from the horses (Enzo) mouth Piss poor planning
  5. Of coarse not. That would have required logical forward planning
  6. Imagine my surprise!!!!
  7. Knock out Liverpool, and it opens up a lot, this competition. Would just need to avoid Man City, and there's a chance. 4-5 more games. It's the age old question... do you play a substantially weakened team? 5 games for glory! Imagine bagging the League Cup and The Championship title, whilst on our little holiday season away from the prem! Two more pieces of silverware
  8. Want us to defend like beavers, and for big Harry Souts to shitehouse us a winner with his noggin
  9. Hermansen Coady Souttar Justin Choudhury K D H Casadei Ndidi Akgun Daka Mavididi
  10. Don't think we have a option on either, and I doubt we will have the funds for these two
  11. I'd like it if we extended both Iheanacho and Ndidi, then took up the options on Fatawu and Yunus. The rest can leave.
  12. Question: Who is our current left back for our u23s?
  13. Correct. Winks and Ricardo
  14. Correct. See my comment re hear map for Doyle above.
  15. But that’s what I’m saying is the wrong approach. To only have JJ covering both right back and left back is bonkers with the amount of games we have this season We’re so reliant on Ricardo playing in his specialty role (and Winks btw), just means we are now left very short after one injury to Doyle
  16. Eh? Do you?
  17. I’m not looking for negatives. As I said, we’ll see won’t we. I disagree with your analysis of the situation
  18. How was he third choice?
  19. Oh ffs 🤦🏻‍♂️ not you aswell!
  20. Listen, if you’re not concerned by the fact that we have two fit full backs (one in Ricardo, that is playing a very specialist role) who are both ‘sick notes’ in their own right, then fine. Time will tell I guess.
  21. There was a lot of stuff going on behind the scenes with him, apparently. He is one who could’ve be handled better. IMO, he could have played the Doyle role well. He did understand it (it’s not hard!) I just don’t think he was wanted
  22. I’ll leave it. I give up
  23. Hamza my arse!
×
×
  • Create New...