Dahnsouff

Maybe, just felt we could get a manager and staff (cheaper the better) largely in place before the period changes, then focus on players once they were in place, but maybe I am just not multi-tasking enough!!

Not sure this is going to cut it tbh If he is going to keep changing things, how the hell will we know when to boo??

Yes, even if they are no longer employed by Chelsea, we would probably need to offer large salaries than we would if they did not have their golden shakes still in play.

Disagree. The manager asap, especially as a backroom team needed building/negotiating for. Squad building cost go into the next period of financial reckoning, so they are not related.

Who wouldn't wants a club legend who wants to be coach, loves the club, is a consummate professional, would expect little from us for a coaching perspective except an opportunity, would be an excellent presence around Seagrave and may become a decent coach. This is not a pity signing, its an opportunity to get what could be a potentially good coach at the ground floor of their development. The problem comes when people expect miracles from such an ex-player joining, and anyway he would only be a junior in the coaching team you imagine.

Fancy selling Nelson and Brunt for a combined £3m is significantly underselling Nelson, and would rather keep him - however, a financial mess means tough choices, and as Nelson features as pure profit then he has much value. (Boo to money talk)

So as it stands, we have Vestergaard Faes Coady Souttar Nelson Brunt? Unless one or two go, and they may, no real point in bringing in a CB.

According to The Athletic, Potter wanted to bring in his backroom team that went with him to Chelsea, which would have offset some of the compensation received for Enzo.

He is fully committed to his fickleness.

Who thought it was ok?

Think we see how the season unfolded differently and that is quite fine, as it would be a bit dull if we all thought the same.

Do you not see that you are just selecting data to suit your argument and just disregarding everything that does not? Lucky? Points before Christmas? You cannot just select any subset of a season and draw a full conclusion.

Feel totally the same, strangely positive without any real idea why! Somehow fresh.

That was nothing like Enzo ball. Another opinion searching for justification.

Enzo left. Breathe easy.

Proper pants that.

If he is part of a 3 that has some mobility to cover for his lack of it, he may be ok and not get exposed too badly…..

After the Norwich set piece coach apparently.

This claim may finally have a chance to be proven (or not) next season assuming Cooper picks him of course. Will be interesting.

Vestergaard is a good player in the right system. There,I said it.

Super Stevie would have had England putting these Danes to the sword by now….

Probably would have preferred Corberan just not sure why, assume because he seems to have less baggage than Potter or Cooper. Potter made sense from a continuity with Enzo in terms of style, but his reluctance seems apparent and that was discouraging. Cooper I knew little about beyond reports on here (fool me once…..) but beyond statistical horror, reports of his past work seem encouraging. Excited to see what he can do and what recruits he will be allowed.

you are welcome England

Quite like Kristiansen….I mean booooo, booooo