Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Dahnsouff

Forum Supporter
  • Posts

    25,796
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by Dahnsouff

  1. ..or do they think it's all about to unravel so its moot anyway.
  2. Jesus Christ.
  3. Suppose the argument is that this time, two of the promoted clubs came up with partial premier league squads.
  4. Maybe he has just decided it’s a good time for a clean break, guess we will see soon enough!
  5. Depends on wages as you would imagine Wilf would be on a wedge by now. Does he get a signing on fee as he is out of contract?
  6. Be very expensive you would have thought?
  7. Thought you might have started 15 was all, but yeah, covers our most successful period under KP. In terms of how much leeway does it give them. Fair amount I reckon, but stewardship is an on-going unending thing, so yes mistakes happen, just need to be seen to be learning.
  8. Judging by your date selection, you seem to be suggesting that if we exclude the premier league win, they have not done very much?
  9. Mates rates innit
  10. I know nothing about what Rudkin or the rest of the unknowable's do outside of what is publicly reported, but as much as I feel our DoF has oversight for financial matters, that there should be acknowledgement of a key fact. Specifically that if I am going to apportion some blame toward him for our wrongs, I must also acknowledge he has played some part in our successes. Will confess that it was a bit silly to suggest a conspiracy, it was more a nod towards the lack of acknowledgement of the one sided nature of the accusations.
  11. Indeed, was just being unnecessarily sarcastic from a point of accepting ignorance.
  12. Yes but imagine that just must be more Rudkin-Washing....
  13. Of course he is. We are naught but a meme.
  14. Like Vardy did in his pomp you mean?
  15. Both things can be true. Yes he should have been stronger and got his shot away, but that does not give the defender the right to come through the man. So it’s a penalty.
  16. He went through him, how is that not a pen?
  17. Doubt it is from a moral perspective. These dodgy deals are probably quite a while in the making and as we were relegated doubt we got an invite to that particular party.
  18. Don’t worry, he left too
  19. Agenda much. He left, let it go fgs
  20. Got Belgium in the work sweepstake, so my jubilation is justified.
  21. Outrage never goes to specsvers
  22. Agree with this, the competitive nature of the sport is so slanted to the benefit of those with historic success, it undoes any capability of sporting integrity. Limiting spending for the many with no special cases, rather than making spending free for the many is the true answer (in my opinion) but as you point out, those of historic significance do not want to see this and gold enough sway to prevent the majority pursuing it either.
  23. Just turned on, delighted to see Yunus.
  24. But this is a sporting competition, it’s anti-competitive to not place restrictions on spending, otherwise it becomes about who has the biggest wallet. Do we really want that? To focus on the “we should all be allowed to spend more” is badly missing the point in my opinion.
×
×
  • Create New...