HankMarvin

When the club knows it can only make 13m losses for this year, it makes it even harder to fathom why we have four GKs, when Ward and Iversen were clearly surplus to requirements in the summer and taking any fee and reducing the wage bill at the same time would’ve been win win. instead we will probably be lucky to get any offers and in that time we will have payed millions in their wages.

It’s not, it’s 35m 35m prem and 13 for the championship

I don’t think it was just on the ball with Pearson, up until Rodger’s went he was getting exclusives on transfer news then it seemed to sour from The Leicester logjam: Why Brendan Rodgers' transfer plans have been paralysed and May 2023 “Complacency, contract mismanagement and a lack of ruthlessness: How the Leicester dream turned sour Just seven years after that fairytale win, Leicester find themselves going from Premier League champions to playing in the Championship.” In a way it’s a double edged sword as a journalist, if you have to write negative articles. Don’t bite the hand that feeds you and all that.

But the financial rewards for promotion are spread over the next 3 seasons after promotion, not counted for this season. For example the playoffs The prize money for winning the 2023 playoffs is £178 million, distributed over the subsequent three seasons. This money can provide financial stability, allow the club to strengthen its roster, and enable it to compete with the world's best teams The merit payments from where you finish in the championship wouldn’t be that significant from 6th to first.

EXCLUSIVELeicester exploit huge loophole in football's spending rules to avoid punishment this season after claiming to be both a Premier League and EFL club at the SAME TIME Leicester have escaped sanctions for potential spending breaches this season The Foxes told both Premier League and EFL they didn't have to meet their rules Football's spending rules are facing further scrutiny after it emerged that Leicester have dodged sanctions this season by claiming to be both a Premier League and an EFL club at the same time. Mail Sport has learned that Leicester have not complied with the Premier League's new fast-track system for potential spending breaches this season despite being at risk of breaking their Profit and Sustainability rules [PSR] for 2022/23 as they were relegated at the end of that campaign, but also avoided being subjected to an EFL spending plan this year on the grounds that they were a top-flight club last season. In an extraordinary set of circumstances Leicester told the EFL in November that they did not have to comply with their regulations as they were a Premier League club last season, yet were not forced to abide by Premier League rules the following month when other clubs at risk of a PSR breach had to submit their accounts. The Leicester case appears to expose a huge loophole at the heart of the football's controversial spending rules, which the club have exploited to give themselves the best chance of returning to the Premier League this season. Leicester could still be charged for breaching the Premier League's £105million loss limits last season, but any punishment and points deduction would apply next season and not jeopardise their promotion hopes, whereas Everton and Nottingham Forest are both facing points deductions this season for overspending during the same period. Leicester City have exploited a huge loophole to avoid complying with Premier League and EFL spending rules following their relegation last season. Enzo Maresca's Leicester are on course for an immediate return to the Premier League The anomaly has arisen after the Premier League introduced new rules for dealing with potential PSR cases last summer following complaints that Everton avoided a points deduction that would have seen them relegated last season, but did not apply them to Leicester. Under the new regulations clubs at risk of a PSR breach must submit their accounts three months earlier than their rivals on 31 December so that any disciplinary case can be concluded and any sanctions applied by the end of the season. Premier League sources confirmed to Mail Sport that their new standard directions only apply to Premier League clubs. Everton and Forest both submitted their accounts to the Premier League in December and were subsequently charged with spending breaches for three years concluding with the 2022/23 season, with their cases to be heard over the next few weeks, but Leicester were not required to do so. Leicester's accounts must be filed by the end of this month and any punishment will be delayed until next season, by which time they are likely to be back in the Premier League, as Enzo Maresca's side lead the Championship by three points with 10 games remaining. To complicate matters further Leicester are also at risk of breaching spending rules for the current season after the EFL's independent club financial reporting unit concluded the club 'was forecasting to breach the Profitability and Sustainability Rules (PSR) loss limits for the three-year period ending with financial year 2023/24'. In November the EFL made an application to make Leicester submit to a business plan which would have limited their spending this season, but the club successfully argued that EFL Rule 2.9 did not apply to them as they were a Premier League club last season. Leicester are permitted to lose up to £83m over the past three years - £70m for two years in the Premier League and £13 million for this season in the EFL. Leicester sold midfielder James Maddison to Tottenham for about £40m last year They reinvested some of that cash in midfielder Harry Winks for £10m to help their bid to return to the Premier League at the first time of asking Their 2021/22 accounts showed a £92.5m loss, and another big loss is expected in their 2022/23 accounts. Leicester could still avoid PSR charges for 2023/24 by raising funds through player sales by the end of June. If they fail to do so then the anomalies in the rules could have major consequences next season and leave Leicester facing two punishments in the same season. The Premier League and EFL are understood to be holding talks over how to achieve greater alignment in their regulations to avoid similar situations occurring in the future.

Yeah but they buckled towards the end of the window and spunked 31m plus tete loan fee

You would hope a club that have previously been in administration would take extra caution.

Coming soon to Netflix John the gaslighter Rudkin.

Yeah it was sustainable whilst selling one big asset per year, unfortunately the well dried up and we were/ are still carrying a lot of dead wood on high wages.

But even if we saw this coming in 22/23 with the lack of transfers, they certainly wouldn’t have factored in a relegation at the end of the season

How much do you think daka will go for as bit part player in the championship?

Kieron Maquire said we needed to cut 100m/110m as wages were 180m towards end of last year

BuT wHaT AbOuT wHeN iT wAs In ThE sUn

Filled with wrecks yes, but none as mighty as ours those clubs are not really comparable given the recent league, fa cup and European football plus 2 top 5 finishes. “Leicester had the most expensive and highest-paid squad in history to be relegated from the Premier League. Their wage bill was more than £180m, the seventh-highest of any club in the division.” the only recent team with an unexpected relegation was Newcastle 2009 and that was with 12th and 13th place finishes. and they finished the following year as Champions with 104

Yeah I mean they can’t possibly add better players, into a successful system that is on the brink of two consecutive promotions. “Whereas Ipswich is all about 'win today and worry about the future when it happens'.” That could’ve be said at the end of last season. Why do you think we are playing in a way that’s more sustainable ? We have lost nearly double the amount they have? .

They have used the same amount of players 29 with less rotation

As we seem to be striker heavy with quality options at this level, maybe he should’ve utilised 2 striker formations more often, thus resting other players for his preferred formation in tougher games

The appearances for Leeds and Ipswich are not to dissimilar to ours with at least 20 players making 14 appearances, the only difference is Leeds and Ipswich have distributed the the remaining appearances over 14 (34 players) and we have 9 (29 in total) But with the strength in depth we have deep in the squad and players coming in at 24th position like Souter with 4 appearances, Coady 22nd with 12 and Pratt 21st with 12 I don’t think the manager can really be moaning about the squad size at this stage.

Beating them at home isn’t a given either, they are top 3 for form over the last 10

Confidence and self belief is going

Robert’s looks younger now than he did 30 years ago

Join 14th top scorer in the league with 10 goals, if he ends up with another 5 that’s a good season and adds to the 4 assists

20 percent Lavia 30 livaremto according to athletic even at 50 percent of both its 115m net don’t think it’s them that have to worry, Leeds spending and net profit on the other hand is worse than ours