kenny

This website is the one I use. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/find/#zoom=6.0&lat=53.39954&lon=-3.03050&layers=102&b=1&z=0&point=0,0 This map is from 1885. Waterloo Street is on the bottom left of this map and was a small street before the second station was demolished.

Streeting, Starmer and McFadden have all complained about the civil service as well.

They could introduce it for a bit then get rid of it again?

Good training if it was ever a person out there. There was a similar story last week about some kids taunting the fire brigade while in the middle of a frozen pond. They went ahead with the rescue as they wanted the practice.

Please include Ayew in this list. Please.

I'm no accountant.... Nice to see he has property deals with a Luxembourg investor. Not as thick as looks then?

I think what's lost in this debate is how well our police dealt with the arseholes from Randers. They have a tough job to do, after all 15 of them got their asses kicked by Napoli fans, they showed Randers it was a one off. Those families of women and small children couldn't deal with our mounted police and all they get is grief from UK fans about not being up to the job.

The more traditional demoninations are empty. I work with a lot of churches that are full and expanding. These are more DJ booths, AV tech and rock bands rather than hard pews so appeal to a wider audience. I suspect a lot of the reason for the popularity in churches remaining will be immigration of course, particularly immigrants from Africa and even China.

It's just an odd system that encourages clubs to reject below amortisation fees in favour of getting nothing.

Ignoring amortisation here... If he is on £50k a week then that is comitted costs by the club in their budgets. If we get in £25k a week from Monaco then that is a profit on the current the budget were we running a normal business. It strikes me that amortising the transfers the way clubs do, means we reject 'income' as it shows as a loss, so its better to have nothing than something, which is weird.

At his age vardy had only scored 34 premier league goals. Too many on this board are writing this guy off too early IMO.

Habit. But you are correct I could hold up a stationary piece of card where Soumare stands so I don't have to see him.

I would 'go local'. We have some decent Tory MP's in Leicester that appear to be doing well in Kearns, O'Brien and Raja. Costa is fine, albeit he won't pull up any trees. If they had a cohort nationally like those, then they would be a better party. Badenoch comes accross well in one to one interviews and less well in the headline stuff IMO.

I no longer care about the clubs money, its not worth it. I just don't want to be forced to watch them play again.

Soumare not vesty I would guess.

It would be sad day if we hadn't been and merely had something better to do.

That kid is a monster.

We ought to be able to deal with musk without worrying about trump. They don't even like each other anymore.

million? Rudkinomics at play?

We have a lot of mechanisms in our system that help and the British people are pragmatic. Look what happened after Truss. Maybe that was the ruthlessness of the Tories that did for her, but she would have been dealt with if she was crashing the country.

They are more loony than Labour at present, one of the issues the current government has is that it won too many seats and has too many candidates it didn't expect to win seats. Reform will be 10x worse. If they got in, they would be out within a year as the party imploded. They are more like a social movement than a political party.

I am a graduate and I employ graduates. They have become 10 a penny and the lack of respect for tradesman has meant they are now in short supply. My guess is that we will see a gentrification of the trades and it will become a middle class pursuit with university becoming a more selective endeavour. If the labour movement wants to be popular then it simply has to deliver for people and not be over focused on itself and its team. It's a very old world view that the working class must vote labour, ethnic minorities must vote labour, public sector must vote labour, why? Why not allow people not to be pigeon holes and allow them to vote for what they think is best for themselves or the country generally. If reform are voted in and becomes the disaster they probably will be, then that will be the end of them. They are gaining popularity as the main parties haven't been seen to deliver. If they get a chance and make a mess, they will be gone. These posts about the left scream 'footballification' to coin a James O'Brien phrase.

Star Wars Burlesque in Birmingham in January. 'The Empire Strips Back'. Im looking forward to seeing what Jabba the Hut looks like.

If the same happens to us, we won't be able to sign any more overpaid dross? If the EFL want to punish us, I would let Rudkin go crazy with the chequebook.

Its hard to see how allowing the trades to earn more and have choice of education for their children as being a bad thing. Typically, my most successful and enterprising clients are from a trades background. They are educated, culturally aware and have the trappings graduates expect without the work ethic and ability. The obsession with classes is outdated and pointless IMO. It's sad that there are still those out there that want people to be oppressed so they vote in a particular way.