Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

MPH

Member
  • Posts

    37,160
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by MPH

  1. So according to the statistics, Fury landed more punches in every round bar round 3 ( no surprise there) and round 4 &7..
  2. hmm.. ok... so that link has the statistics of the Fury fight and notes that Fury landed the more punches. Ngannou only landed 6 punchs in the last 2 rounds which COULD be why they gave it to Fury. Other than just blatant corruption, of course..
  3. https://x.com/CompuBox/status/1718410933565813237?s=20
  4. tough question and a risky move... I don't think we could take the risk of his bad habits rubbing off on some of our younger players. Everyone likes a drinking buddy.... It's possible that we thought about it but decided not to..
  5. I think he'll give it 6 months and sign again for someone. Either that or he'll open a bar in benidorm.
  6. yeah I know but debating has a bit more of an aggressive undertone and I just didn’t see it that way
  7. You had to get the last in there one last time. and I hate that it comes across as debating, I didn’t mean to make anything sound as harsh as that, just two people discussing their thoughts
  8. thats the thing though. I don’t think he IS political roast because the simple fact he’s been able to link up with the opposition will show you the deep rooted feeling amongst the Israeli people against Hamas. Another way to look at it is that the opposition had no option but to form an alliance over this simply so he didn’t get left behind in the polls and amongst popular opinion. Also, I don’t think he cares one bit about international feeling when it comes to, as he sees this, defending the nation of Israel. Neither does the international community vote for the Israeli Prime Minister.
  9. I’m not blaming anyone. I’m simply talking about moral high ground. New owners or not, it was all done under the name of Leicester City. and just because you haven’t mentioned man city doesn’t mean I can’t?
  10. you can dress it up how you like but if someone is acquitted of a crime they are still deemed ‘ not guilty’ so therefor ‘ they did nothing wrong’ even though we all know they did. What they did was morally wrong on all levels You’ve really said nothing to counter what I was saying. Also We know the rules about the 10 point deduction didn’t come in to place until after our administration, but disagreeing with that part was never my argument and we can try and justify why did it but we really did take the east way out. We all know we did.
  11. well if we had been deducted 10 points for going into administration then that could have made a huge difference could it not have? For all intents and purposes it seems like we took a very easy route out of our issues by going into administration plus in the 13-14 season we paid millions in a settlement for breaching the FFP rules so you could argue , even if we operated within the rules for administration we certainly have no moral high ground to be critical of others. I mean, if we are talking about the letter of the law Man City have done nothing wrong as they were acquitted weren’t they?
  12. is that really a fair comparison in the context of our discussion?
  13. i mean, we had rules changed because of us… we can talk about how we didn’t break any laws but that doesn’t mean we can take the moral high ground either and point fingers elsewhere..
  14. I’m not so sure on this. Because of the Hamas attack, they will want to elect a leader who will show a strong approach and ‘control’ Hamas. if he can successfully pass the Hamas attack off as a security services failure AND decimate what Hamas has to offer, he could be a Shoe in for the next 10+ years, unfortunately..
  15. MPH

    Ukraine

    A lot seems to change in 20 years…
  16. Many heavy drug users or previous abusers can have heart problems so even if indirectly, it’s probably still drug related.
  17. Well, to be fair, it’s been more than a year since Ngannou has fought too, hasn’t it? And that wasn’t even boxing! for me, him saying he hasn’t fought for about a year is a terrible excuse.
  18. id love to see Joshua v Ngannou first…
  19. I’m more interested in seeing Francis Ngannou’s next fight than I am Fury’s..
  20. Bloody fixed. I knew it
  21. I’d be very surprised if they let nGannou win this wether he’s done well enough or not…
  22. I’m concerned that the Saudi’s are going to think that’s there’s no way they can let Fury lose this…
  23. I’d love to hear Fury explain this one away…
×
×
  • Create New...