MPH

So another winter World Cup then

sort of

Then neither can you?

For the Dennis wise situation, if i remember correctly, we fined him 2 weeks wages and then sacked him and under british employment law you cant punish someone twice for the same offense. Such a calamitous handling of the situation...

But everyone had that deal collapse is my point. and we'd be a bit naïve to think we were the only club that had financial constraints on us ,, to us it was a stadium, to someone else it might have been something different... we'd have to have an intricate knowledge of everyone elses finances to truly say ours was unique.. and we dont.

Thank you for clarifying/ re explaining. I'm not able to work properly right now for health reasons - surgery on Monday so i just have a lot more time on my hands. To me what is 'discussing' might come across as being argumentative so i'm sorry if it comes across that way..

everyone want an Arias in their team.

just making sure because you did mention that you dont see it ending unless you remove the people!

see above post. saying we are special because we were building a stadium is such a cheap line to use.

oh please don't give me that rubbish., What im smart enough to do is take off the blue tinted specs and realize that we are just one of many clubs with different challenges all going on at the same time.

The idea that Leicester City have this unique situation and that we are special just doesn't make any sense. Time to take off the blue tinted specs. The reality is we don't know anything about the goings on at the other relegated clubs - other than that despite relegation and the folding of the tv deal they were able to keep on going and not go into administration. They probably budgeted accordingly as we do also know that neither of them got back into the premier league that season.

did the other relegated clubs go into administration?

so bad planning and badly run club then that didn't prepare for possible relegation?

Because i want to

Are you suggesting the Palestinians should just abandon their homeland?

With regards to Hamza,I think he thought the song was just meaning he wanted Palestinians to be free.verywhere. yes it’s true some people.. a lot of people have used the song to mean more sinister things than just that.. but let’s take the British flag for example.. for me it’s just a flag. I’m proud to be British. I like it. I take one with me on holidays, ect. But for other people it takes on a sinister meaning.. it’ can be held by racists.. those supporting anti immigration policies… its even been waived after racist murders, ect.. Is the flag inherently racist? No it isn’t. And I shouldn’t be stopped from displaying one just because of the racist actions of others. I see it as the same for this song.

if the sky digital was such a main issue then other clubs would have gone into administration too would they not? and you’ve already mentioned we would have finished 2nd with the point’s deduction but I explained that had we budgeted better ( without the sky digital money like every other club managed to do) then we would have had a smaller playing budget ( spent ,was money) and probably wouldn’t have accumulated as many points. ijust don’t buy the argument we were the only team that season effected by the issues around - every other team managed to avoid administration that season except amazingly tea treat striving for the riches of the premier league. spend, get to the prem, go into administration, restructure debts and pay them with our prem money. it’s pretty obvious that’s what our plan was.

I don’t think I just meant the 10 point deduction.. I mentioned about how the lack of a consequence over the whole season may have effected our playing budget, possibly… and who knows how many points difference that could have made? I think we knew exactly what we were doing and where it was all heading.

I once got banned for calling GingerFox a coppernob but that’s it…

no, that’s not what I said. There were less consequences for us to go into administration. . I think we went into administration only a couple of months after building our stadium and also without cutting into our playing budgets. I’m sure we would have done things very differently had we had a consequence hanging over our head.- perhaps either not benefiting of the long term financial benefits of having a new stadium or a cut in our playing budget as I’m very sure we didn’t prepare for what could happen. far more sensible/ fair of our current owners to wait until we can afford the expansion, for example.. or maybe they are aware of the consequence of not doing so? ( we finished second that year and maybe the team finishing 3rd could have cause for complaints at missing out of the prem)

This makes it a bit clearer…

I think he definitely intended to trip him, but not hurt him like that...

I definitely think those that don’t like how this forum is run should ask for their money back…………..