Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
sphericalfox

Ifs and Ands

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, sphericalfox said:

Should it be pink elephant? :unsure:

No it just made me laugh for some reason. 

 

I like it as a nickname for him lol 

Posted
Just now, Bayfox said:

No it just made me laugh for some reason. 

 

I like it as a nickname for him lol 

I've had to edit it now... lol

 

Can't be construed as something it wasn't meant to be. 'elephant in the room' it is now.

Posted

Is today a 'what if'? Will the Tinkerman live up to his moniker?

 

 

A midfield of King & Amartey?

 

Will we see James on the bench? Will he get some minutes on the pitch?

 

Will it be Ulloa or Slimani ready to come on?

 

If we fail to get 3 points will people be satisfied with a point if we put up a better performance across the team?

 

Will Vardy finally find his shootin boots? Is this possible without service from the midfield?

 

Keep Albrighton or bring in Musa to start as we're at home? Or will we need to rely on decent crosses without decent passing midfield?

 

With that in mind, will we spend today watching our CBs hoofing over the midfield aimlessly?

 

Will Huth get another yellow and strategically miss the game at Sunderland so that he doesn't miss the Man City game?

 

How will Boro set themselves up to stifle us? Can we expect them to double mark Vardy and Mahrez, leaving us only one route to goal?

 

So many ifs and ands...

 

https://sphericalfox.wordpress.com/2016/11/20/ifs-and-ands/

 

 

Posted
On ‎20‎/‎11‎/‎2016 at 16:36, Bayfox said:

Kante the white elephant lol 

I would argue that's the wrong term of frase to use on Kante.

 

I always thought a white elephant was some thing of no use you can't get rid of.

 

I don't remember use not wanting him or it being a struggle to get rid of him.

Posted

Correct ...

 

 

A white elephant is a possession which its owner cannot dispose of and whose cost, particularly that of maintenance, is out of proportion to its usefulness.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Countryfox said:

Correct ...

 

 

A white elephant is a possession which its owner cannot dispose of and whose cost, particularly that of maintenance, is out of proportion to its usefulness.

Ha! Was written after a week of non-sleep, and amended after my failure to make sense was pointed out. It happens. Like our midfield passing. Just not reaching the intended target, I take the full repercussions that come with it.

 

26 minutes ago, Countryfox said:

 

Will they need to ...   :ph34r:

I hope that we try something a little different, but I suspect we'll commit to our standard approach. It's a shame that at the minute I'm more reliant on hope than assurance. But maybe it'll be our turning point cos otherwise my last couple of optimistic blogs will have me with pancake all over my face.

Posted
3 minutes ago, sphericalfox said:

Ha! Was written after a week of non-sleep, and amended after my failure to make sense was pointed out. It happens. Like our midfield passing. Just not reaching the intended target, I take the full repercussions that come with it.

 

I hope that we try something a little different, but I suspect we'll commit to our standard approach. It's a shame that at the minute I'm more reliant on hope than assurance. But maybe it'll be our turning point cos otherwise my last couple of optimistic blogs will have me with pancake all over my face.

I hope something comes from this ...   sometimes when a key player is out due to injury or suspension a manager stumbles across something new ...    and at the moment that would not be a bad thing due to our weakness in midfield and over reliance on DD. 

Posted
8 hours ago, Countryfox said:

I hope something comes from this ...   sometimes when a key player is out due to injury or suspension a manager stumbles across something new ...    and at the moment that would not be a bad thing due to our weakness in midfield and over reliance on DD. 

for now...just for now...

 

url-4.jpeg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...