One Premier League we are actually bottom of - which is a really good thing though!! Pre season travel and CO2 emissions

[Bucks fox]

Premier League teams	Air miles travelled in pre-season	C02 emissions per passenger (in Kg)	Carbon emissions per football team in Metric Tons
Aston Villa	22419	2921	87.63
Leeds United	21858	2736	82.08
Manchester United	21507	2642	79.29
Crystal Palace	22819	2583	77.49
Liverpool	14160	1804	54.12
Tottenham Hotspur	15330	1770	53.1
Chelsea	13421	1639	49.17
Arsenal	9808	1247	37.41
Manchester City	9505	1123	33.69
Everton	8297	980	29.4
Nottingham Forest	3258	534	16.02
Newcastle United	3253	460	13.8
Wolverhampton Wanderers	2503	392	11.76
Fulham	2174	349	10.47
AFC Bournemouth	1994	302	9.06
Brighton & Hove Albion	1916	296	8.88
West Ham United	1206	278	8.34
Brentford	1318	269	8.07
Southampton	1548	264	7.92
Leicester City	564	134	4.02
Grand Total	178858	22721	681.6

Edited 3 August 2022 by Bucks fox

[RobHawk]

I always prefer a more low key and local pre season anyway, I think it prepares the team much better and I think we pretty much nailed it this year. 

[davieG]

 

[Fear Of The Fox]

It was discussed yesterday. I would personally not allow this kind of topics here because the whole discussion can easily derail into politics but it's up to the mods to decide. There are people out there with scientific knowledge that can have valid arguments regarding climate change. 

[leicsmac]

6 minutes ago, Fear Of The Fox said:

It was discussed yesterday. I would personally not allow this kind of topics here because the whole discussion can easily derail into politics but it's up to the mods to decide. There are people out there with scientific knowledge that can have valid arguments regarding climate change. 

Feel free to ask @Line-X.

 

And to add my own two pennyworth, lowering the carbon footprint of football clubs (and other organisations) while at the same time innovating more sustainable methods of travel in order to maintain the current quality of life is a good thing.

Edited 3 August 2022 by leicsmac

[Fear Of The Fox]

3 minutes ago, leicsmac said:

Feel free to ask @Line-X.

 

And to add my own two pennyworth, lowering the carbon footprint of football clubs (and other organisations) while at the same time innovating more sustainable methods of travel in order to maintain the current quality of life is a good thing.

I agree with you. I still think that this topic should be in the general discussion and not in the main Leicester football team forum as it involves a heavier politics/science discussion. 

[leicsmac]

7 minutes ago, Fear Of The Fox said:

I agree with you. I still think that this topic should be in the general discussion and not in the main Leicester football team forum as it involves a heavier politics/science discussion. 

Fair to say.

 

Such discussion is always welcome on the Sci-Tech thread.

[Cincinnati Fox]

I prefer a local preseason and from a environmental view it’s also better.

however from a financial point of view there is a reason the rich/big teams are out there. 

[urban.spaceman]

You'll never sing that

[oxtonfox]

I noticed that this report didn’t mention Leicester at all for their green credentials; again focus on the twat six, sorry top six