“Hubris and Muddled Thinking Have Seen Leicester Spiral Towards Relegation”

[Clever Fox]

58 minutes ago, Babylon said:

Probably talking about KP, he’s not the Chairman of KP and is ultimately answerable to the board of KP as they own the club. 
 

Vichai’s wife and the board members could say NO to a request for an injection of money and there is nothing he could do about it, other than put in his own money. 

This is the point I made earlier. Unless he buys out the Club or his Mother hands it to him he's going to be dependent and answerable to KP.

I'm not sure he has the money to buy out the club presently. In a few years who knows.

[Guest Chocolate Teapot]

55 minutes ago, Stadt said:

This is what's really telling to me. Landing Sormaz was a coup, he soon cleared off. Macia oversaw probably our best ever window, didn't stick around. Allowing Congerton to waltz in was a disaster and the majority of the forum disapproved even at the time.

 

You'd think the academy would be well ran and well integrated with the first team at least given Rudkin's links to it. Nope, successive relegations (saved only by a restructure). Our brightest talents kept at the club only to be injured, Villa blokes on trial half the time etc.

Apparently the masterplan with the training ground was to nick the forest under 12s due to the new catchment area but most of them having gone back anyway 🤣

[sycokilla]

On 14/05/2023 at 18:44, sacreblueits442 said:

...how do you know that was the case!!!

because thats his job

[sacreblueits442]

31 minutes ago, sycokilla said:

because thats his job

....just for clarification!!!

You said, "As Rudkin is responsible for advising him to keep Brendan until it was too late"

Your reply, above beggars belief, why would he not be asking for Rodgers to be sacked? Why is it his job to be telling your chairman to keep hold of an underachieving manager?

[Gamble92]

On 14/05/2023 at 11:36, Tuna said:

Rudkin reports directly to Top, as he did Vichai, and is his boss’ chief advisory voice on all matters from signings to managerial sackings and appointments.

 

Congratulations Mr Bumkin

[sycokilla]

9 hours ago, sacreblueits442 said:

....just for clarification!!!

You said, "As Rudkin is responsible for advising him to keep Brendan until it was too late"

Your reply, above beggars belief, why would he not be asking for Rodgers to be sacked? Why is it his job to be telling your chairman to keep hold of an underachieving manager?

because he is the director of football? ... as you said before, i dont really know for certain, who does ? its just conjecture based on normal dynamics between chairmen and DOF.   ""Your reply, above beggars belief ""  then I am happy to join hundreds of others on this forum.