theboywillmott Posted 20 January 2006 Share Posted 20 January 2006 I see there are no proposed Q&A Evenings proposed before the end of the season down at the Walkers. I thought they usually did 3 or 4 a season. I don't believe in coincidence but However the players award evening is on May 4th this year - note for diary. I would like to present an award for "biggest failure of the season". The 'trophey' will be a manilla envelope containing the shreaded contract of the winner mounted on a mahogany plinth. The all important list of nominations has been released and voting closes on 4th May 2006 at 18:00. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chimp Posted 20 January 2006 Share Posted 20 January 2006 Of course the award should go to CL for his performance so far this season, he's failed in leading the team to complete their primary task, i.e. get results, so it has to go to him. That said, I wouldn't be dissapointed if at the end of the season we could say otherwise. Doesn't look likely though atm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louise Posted 20 January 2006 Share Posted 20 January 2006 I see there are no proposed Q&A Evenings proposed before the end of the season down at the Walkers. I thought they usually did 3 or 4 a season. I don't believe in coincidence but They did one with Elliott not long ago. Unless you're talking about with the current manager, or playing staff, which they certainly don't do 3 or 4 times a season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milky Posted 20 January 2006 Share Posted 20 January 2006 levein of course is the obvious candidate. i voted for sylla though, he promised so much in the pre season games like celtic with his trickery and flair, yet all he has done is laze around the pitch. very disappointing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Posted 20 January 2006 Share Posted 20 January 2006 why is wilcox on here he has hardly played due to injury and being on loan it seems a little unfair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strokes Posted 20 January 2006 Share Posted 20 January 2006 why is wilcox on here he has hardly played due to injury and being on loan it seems a little unfair Well he hasn't been a sucsess, so he must have been a faliure therefore on the list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Posted 20 January 2006 Share Posted 20 January 2006 what for, suffering a potentially career ending injury in the 1st few months of being here, or getting another (less serious) knee injury at the start of this season, we have never seen a full fit wilcox which we may, after his loan spell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strokes Posted 20 January 2006 Share Posted 20 January 2006 what for, suffering a potentially career ending injury in the 1st few months of being here, or getting another (less serious) knee injury at the start of this season, we have never seen a full fit wilcox which we may, after his loan spell Yes, but define faliure - non sucessful, has he been sucessful?? No, so he is a faliure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Head Honcho Posted 20 January 2006 Share Posted 20 January 2006 I don't think you can blame any one player, simply because we've all seen they can play on their day so they are not really bad players but as a team they look bad individually-if that makes sense! You have to say the biggest failures have been Craig Levein and his coaching staff because he ultimately signed the players and the coaching staff are responsible for the training of the players! I'm sure 90% of our squad would be welcomed into most of the top teams in our division! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Don Posted 20 January 2006 Share Posted 20 January 2006 I've voted for the board and for one reason only - selling Connolly - With him playing, I could see us being in a top ten position, maybe even the playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davieG Posted 20 January 2006 Share Posted 20 January 2006 I've voted for the board and for one reason only - selling Connolly - With him playing, I could see us being in a top ten position, maybe even the playoffs. The board may have done many things wrong but they had little choice over the Connolly sale - the simple fact is that he wanted to go, there isn't a football manager in the land who would willing hang on to a player who wanted to leave. So how can you justify what you are saying? Besides he wasn't that prolific and I didn't see us maintaining a top ten position in the league last season, so you last statement is nothing but wishful thinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strokes Posted 20 January 2006 Share Posted 20 January 2006 I've voted for the board and for one reason only - selling Connolly - With him playing, I could see us being in a top ten position, maybe even the playoffs. I'm sorry but that was a good bit of business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyh1884 Posted 20 January 2006 Share Posted 20 January 2006 I'm sorry but that was a good bit of business. I didn't think it did at the time. selling our best striker to a club with a portion of the fee dependent on them staying up but now they're almost guaranteed to stay up £3mill does seem pretty good. wonder how that extra million will be spent in the summer.................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Posted 20 January 2006 Share Posted 20 January 2006 I'm sorry but that was a good bit of business. especially as we have another million on the way for nothing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Don Posted 20 January 2006 Share Posted 20 January 2006 I'm sorry but that was a good bit of business. So good piece of business that we have still to find a forward that has been able to command a starting spot in the team week in week out. Hopefully hume and fryatt will become good, cos they certainly have promise. But how much would you give for a proven goalscorer now?? How much would relegation cost us?? Its all very good me saying this in hindsight though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strokes Posted 20 January 2006 Share Posted 20 January 2006 So good piece of business that we have still to find a forward that has been able to command a starting spot in the team week in week out. Hopefully hume and fryatt will become good, cos they certainly have promise. But how much would you give for a proven goalscorer now?? How much would relegation cost us?? Its all very good me saying this in hindsight though. 2.5 Mil PROFIT on a player who never really turned it on, and i believe we have a better player in hume. So actually excellent bit of business, hopfully we can use the extra Mil from wigan staying up to pay CL compo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chimp Posted 20 January 2006 Share Posted 20 January 2006 So good piece of business that we have still to find a forward that has been able to command a starting spot in the team week in week out. Hopefully hume and fryatt will become good, cos they certainly have promise. But how much would you give for a proven goalscorer now?? How much would relegation cost us?? Its all very good me saying this in hindsight though. Connolly? A proven goalscorer? Some people have short memories... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Head Honcho Posted 20 January 2006 Share Posted 20 January 2006 Connolly? A proven goalscorer? Some people have short memories... What are you on about ? 17 goals in 48 game isn't to be sniffed at! Ok he had an abysmal first 6 months, but that was due to an injury and his fitness. After he scored against Watford last year he never looked back and scored 11 goals in 13 games if you include the first 2 games of this year. Wins against Derby, Millwall and Leeds and draws against Brighton, WHU and Watford in which he scored in all six games probably saved us from relegation last season! I'll take a bit of that now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theboywillmott Posted 20 January 2006 Author Share Posted 20 January 2006 why is wilcox on here he has hardly played due to injury and being on loan it seems a little unfair Doesn't that prove he is a failure though? We bought him to play for us and he is either injured or farmed out on loan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milky Posted 20 January 2006 Share Posted 20 January 2006 What are you on about ? 17 goals in 48 game isn't to be sniffed at! and how many of those were penalties just out of curiousity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strokes Posted 20 January 2006 Share Posted 20 January 2006 and how many of those were penalties just out of curiousity 6 or 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Head Honcho Posted 20 January 2006 Share Posted 20 January 2006 6 or 7 Make that 3 but does it matter how many are penalties he scored? The facts are that he scored in vital games at the end of last season which kept us up! Can't you all remember the end of last season? We were almost in as much shit as we are now! Connolly's goals saved us last season, whose goals are going to save us this season? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strokes Posted 20 January 2006 Share Posted 20 January 2006 Make that 3 but does it matter how many are penalties he scored? The facts are that he scored in vital games at the end of last season which kept us up! Can't you all remember the end of last season? We were almost in as much shit as we are now! Connolly's goals saved us last season, whose goals are going to save us this season? Hopefully Fryatt's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Head Honcho Posted 20 January 2006 Share Posted 20 January 2006 Hopefully Fryatt's Let us pray Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_lcfc Posted 20 January 2006 Share Posted 20 January 2006 craig levein should win as he is the boss of the failures so responsible for them. the board appointed him before this season so its not their fault,.. levein for his lack of motivation skills and wank results and not saying thanks to the crowd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.