Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Ash

Player Ratings v Coventry

By Ash, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

Ric Flair

Ric Flair

Posted
Posted

I'm a big fan of Scowcroft this season, but he was extremely average yesterday only because he didn't get the ball much. He certainly wasn't our best player considering Tiatto and Nalis were awesome. Connolly should be Scowcroft's best friend really because the amount of times Connolly drops deep and fires low crosses in for him to get on to he should be grateful. I think these two will work well together as they did at Crewe but last night our strikers didn't get many opportunities in front of goal.

Stuliasz

Stuliasz

Posted
Posted

Pressman 7

Canero 6.5

Tiatto 9

Heath 7.5

Dabizas 7.5

Gillespie 7

Stewart 8

Gudjonsson 6

Nalis 8

Connolly 7

Scowcroft 8

Subs:

Morris 6.5

Gemmill 6

Ric Flair

Ric Flair

Posted
Posted
Pressman 7

Canero 6.5

Tiatto 9

Heath 7.5

Dabizas 7.5

Gillespie 7

Stewart 8

Gudjonsson 6

Nalis 8

Connolly 7

Scowcroft 8

Subs:

Morris 6.5

Gemmill 6

34274[/snapback]

I'm sorry but how can you give Dabizas a 7.5? He was awful constantly fouling and being a menace.

Teeno

Teeno

Posted
Posted
Pressman - 7

Canero - 7

Heath - 7

Dabizas - 6

Stewart- 7

Tiatto - 8

Nalis - 8*

Gudjonsson - 6

Gillespie - 6

Connolly -6

Scowy - 6

Subs :

Morris - 6

Gemmill - 6

34151[/snapback]

Thought you only saw 10% of the game :thumbup:

Shum

Shum

Posted
Posted

Again, on watching the game in full after the game, Dabizas made some great interceptions and generally looked ok last night.

And being a menace is a good thing for a defender! :P

Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

Pressman - 6.5

Canero - 7

Heath - 6

Dabizas - 5

Stewart - 6

Tiatto - 7.5

Nalis - 8

Gudjonsson - 7

Gillespie - 6.5

Connolly - 6.5

Scowy - 6

Subs :

Morris - 6.5

Gemmill - 6

Ric Flair

Ric Flair

Posted
Posted
Again, on watching the game in full after the game, Dabizas made some great interceptions and generally looked ok last night.

And being a menace is a good thing for a defender! :P

34281[/snapback]

Every interception he makes he fouls the player aswell, he's shit1 You know it, I know and soon Craig Levein will know it. His european championship medal around his neck is weighing him down.

Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
Again, on watching the game in full after the game, Dabizas made some great interceptions and generally looked ok last night.

And being a menace is a good thing for a defender! :P

34281[/snapback]

Every interception he makes he fouls the player aswell, he's shit1 You know it, I know and soon Craig Levein will know it. His european championship medal around his neck is weighing him down.

34305[/snapback]

He committed one howler of a foul right in front of us. I told him exactly what I thought of him. I know this isn't very helpful, but he's so frustrating. Always backing off until he has to do something, by which time he has to hack the player 'cos he's so far away!

If he's not giving away free-kicks, he's trying to play the ball out of defence!! No Nikos, HOOF THE BLOODY THING!!!

andy_croydz

andy_croydz

Posted
Posted

Petrescu neevr fails to amaze me anyway, gives stewart a 8 and scowcroft a 4 just shows you hes arse bumming stewart and wright secretly and because scowcrofts married with kids he cant arse bum him :thumbup:

Pressman - 7

Canero - 7

Heath - 7.5

Dabizas - 7

Stewart - 7.5

Tiatto - 8

Nalis - 8

Gudjonsson - 6.5

Gillespie - 7

Connolly - 7.5

Scowy - 7

Subs :

Morris - 6.5

Gemmill - not on long enough for me to judge him.

Scow

Scow

Posted
Posted
Are the moderators of this board supposed to know a thing or two  about football?

It would seem that Petrescu is stuck with his Scowcroft prejudices and Scowy can't judge Gillespie fairly - It must be a Mark thing!

34225[/snapback]

I'm judging Gillespie from what I saw last night. After watching the game again, I admit I was slightly harsh towards him, although I did say originally he tried hard. He did attempt to make things happen, but he's a winger who couldn't go past his man and deliver a cross. That's what wingers are supposed to do, are they not? Hopefully, further match practice may allow him to be able to create some space for himself and deliver crosses.

Muz

Muz

Posted
Posted

Pressman - 7

Canero - 6

Heath - 8

Dabizas - 7

Stewart - 8

Gillespie - 7

Gudjonsson - 8

Nalis - 8

Tiatto - 8

Scowcroft - 7

Connolly - 9*

Subs

Morris - 6

Gemmil - 5

Mark

Mark

Posted
Posted
He deffo was NOT Man of the Match, but I feel that a 4 / 5 rating was a bit harsh!

34261[/snapback]

He did nothing all game. I was going to give him a 3 but i made it a 4 for the header off a typical long ball to his predictable head which lead to the goal. He won more headers in the game i know, but very few went to anyone. Awful.

Hullfox

Hullfox

Posted
Posted
He deffo was NOT Man of the Match, but I feel that a 4 / 5 rating was a bit harsh!

34261[/snapback]

He did nothing all game. I was going to give him a 3 but i made it a 4 for the header off a typical long ball to his predictable head which lead to the goal. He won more headers in the game i know, but very few went to anyone. Awful.

34326[/snapback]

Well you are entitled to your opinion even if it is wrong

Ric Flair

Ric Flair

Posted
Posted

Personally I thought Scowy was pretty average to say the least last night. He didn't see much of the ball and was fouled so much but to no avail. Hopefully he'll be back to his best on saturday because if he puts performances in like he did last night then we will struggle for goals from the strikers.

Stuliasz

Stuliasz

Posted
Posted
Are the moderators of this board supposed to know a thing or two  about football?

It would seem that Petrescu is stuck with his Scowcroft prejudices and Scowy can't judge Gillespie fairly - It must be a Mark thing!

34225[/snapback]

I'm judging Gillespie from what I saw last night. After watching the game again, I admit I was slightly harsh towards him, although I did say originally he tried hard. He did attempt to make things happen, but he's a winger who couldn't go past his man and deliver a cross. That's what wingers are supposed to do, are they not? Hopefully, further match practice may allow him to be able to create some space for himself and deliver crosses.

34317[/snapback]

I think that simply having Gillespie there was a bonus and added width even if he did struggle to beat his man. I personally thought he did really well considering he's hardly played any first team football for ages before the Crewe game, but having a natural right winger just out there widens the play no end.

Cat Burger

Cat Burger

Posted
Posted
Pressman - 7

Canero - 6

Heath - 8

Dabizas - 7

Stewart - 8

Gillespie - 7

Gudjonsson - 8

Nalis - 8

Tiatto - 8

Scowcroft - 7

Connolly - 9*

Subs

Morris - 6

Gemmil - 5

34322[/snapback]

Canero 6!? <_< You're blind mate!!!! 3rd best man on the pitch behind Nalis and Tiatto.

Muz

Muz

Posted
Posted
Pressman - 7

Canero - 6

Heath - 8

Dabizas - 7

Stewart - 8

Gillespie - 7

Gudjonsson - 8

Nalis - 8

Tiatto - 8

Scowcroft - 7

Connolly - 9*

Subs

Morris - 6

Gemmil - 5

34322[/snapback]

Canero 6!? <_< You're blind mate!!!! 3rd best man on the pitch behind Nalis and Tiatto.

34337[/snapback]

Not in the first half!

Anish

Anish

Posted
Posted

This is supposed to be a player rating thread - not a disagreement thread between everyone on their ratings! We all see the game differently, but to give anyone a rating of 4 is extremely harsh after a convincing victory and a clean sheet.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...