Maybes Posted 24 February 2007 Posted 24 February 2007 So, 90 minutes had been up on the score board for around 2 minutes before the flaming fourth official decided he would stretch his legs and decide to display an additional 3 minutes of added on time. What the hell was he doing? Why did rennie play the 3 minutes then add on another 3? What a pair of idiots!!
DB11 Posted 24 February 2007 Posted 24 February 2007 They just didn't want the game to end, it was a cracking game after all
dandannieldanok Posted 24 February 2007 Posted 24 February 2007 So, 90 minutes had been up on the score board for around 2 minutes before the flaming fourth official decided he would stretch his legs and decide to display an additional 3 minutes of added on time. What the hell was he doing? Why did rennie play the 3 minutes then add on another 3? What a pair of idiots!! I tihnk it was Rennie's fault. After all, the fourth official needs to be told how much to add on. Rennie was absolute bollocks, fat bastard!
JoeyB Posted 24 February 2007 Posted 24 February 2007 at 52 mins me and a few other people around us couldn't believe we had played 7 mins, then we realised that the game kicked off again at 410(on the score board) and at 415 it says we were on the 53rd min
Guest Gist Posted 24 February 2007 Posted 24 February 2007 The score board wasn't correct so they played to the Officials watches.
Toby or not Toby Posted 24 February 2007 Posted 24 February 2007 the scoreboard at the kop end wasn't working last week either
syston_fox Posted 24 February 2007 Posted 24 February 2007 For the first two minutes of the second half, the clock wasnt working and then it suddenly went to 53 minutes.... and then instead of going to 54 minutes, it went back to 53 and kept doing this for about 5 minutes. In the end i think it was 3 minutes fast so when it was 90 minutes on the scoreboard, it was only the 87th minute
C-man Posted 24 February 2007 Posted 24 February 2007 The Time is 4 minutes fast on the Walkers clock, hence why we seem to kick off at 3.05 every week, and the time played broke at half time. It started again 3 minutes into the second half, but started on 52 minutes. Hence why we played an extra 3 or 4 minutes before the board went up
Stuliasz Posted 24 February 2007 Posted 24 February 2007 Yeh not many people noticed but they forgot to start the clock at half time, and then about 3 minutes into the 2nd half (48 mins on my watch), they started it at 52 so it was always going to confuse people who hadn't noticed. So as nice as it would be to say the assistants were at fault, it wasn't them!
Simi Posted 24 February 2007 Posted 24 February 2007 I thought there was a problem because the time is not normally 5 mins out on my phone. Second week something has gone wrong with the score board.
Leonisco Posted 24 February 2007 Posted 24 February 2007 The Time is 4 minutes fast on the Walkers clock, hence why we seem to kick off at 3.05 every week, and the time played broke at half time. It started again 3 minutes into the second half, but started on 52 minutes. Hence why we played an extra 3 or 4 minutes before the board went up Oh right, I was wondering why we'd only played 13 minutes at twenty-past four!
Harpenden Fox Posted 24 February 2007 Posted 24 February 2007 For the first two minutes of the second half, the clock wasnt working and then it suddenly went to 53 minutes.... and then instead of going to 54 minutes, it went back to 53 and kept doing this for about 5 minutes. In the end i think it was 3 minutes fast so when it was 90 minutes on the scoreboard, it was only the 87th minute Good explanation syston fox, thanks, but I think you were guilty of clock watching today sir, you need to concentrate for the full 90!
Milky Posted 24 February 2007 Posted 24 February 2007 Yeh i noticed the mistake. Others lack of awareness around me was comical.
Brainy Posted 24 February 2007 Posted 24 February 2007 the scoreboard at the kop end wasn't working last week either Something MM can fix
philce Posted 24 February 2007 Posted 24 February 2007 It was funny seeing the "loyal supporters" leaving when the clock was showing 78 minutes, when it was only 74 mins really. It really gets to me these people arrive late then leave 5 minutes from the end, whats the point? Still it must have worried Rennie when half of our team pointed out that the scoreboard was showing 90 mins! But then again he is a total co*k so probably thought he could get into the papers by playing some extra "rennie" time! Cheers Phil Oh right, I was wondering why we'd only played 13 minutes at twenty-past four!
Wezleylowski Posted 24 February 2007 Posted 24 February 2007 leicester city in a nutshell, but no matter because with milans millions we will have a big screen before long .yaaay
filbertboy Posted 25 February 2007 Posted 25 February 2007 my dad said that the result was the last one up on the telly today so somethings wrong with the clocks !! and yep the ref was a right tw*t
Cat Burger Posted 25 February 2007 Posted 25 February 2007 I swear Rennie didn't blow the whistle for full time, he was standing there at the end with his hands on his hips like WTF? Fat ****er
Matt Posted 25 February 2007 Posted 25 February 2007 I swear Rennie didn't blow the whistle for full time, he was standing there at the end with his hands on his hips like WTF? Fat ****er I didn't hear a FT whistle either.
DB11 Posted 25 February 2007 Posted 25 February 2007 I heard a whistle, but it was nothing like the full time type blows you hear.
lcfc_jme Posted 26 February 2007 Posted 26 February 2007 I heard a whistle, but it was nothing like the full time type blows you hear. Agreed. There was definitely a whistle but it was quite quiet and barely recognisable what with the Baggies willing Kamara through to score and win the game for them right next to us. The officiating in general wasn't too great though in all honesty was it? It'd have been a better game than it was if the officials (Rennie in particular) were not so obsessed with stoppages.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.