Zingari Posted 18 September 2007 Posted 18 September 2007 Ladies and Gentlemen...Mark has left the forum. Please make your way to the exits. Thank you for laughing very hard at his post. Please take any wee that might have escaped with you. Thank you and good-night. but come on ; we were all thinking the same thing
Eastern Fox Posted 18 September 2007 Posted 18 September 2007 It shows something about his tactical mentality: he'd rather get a tall defender on that can head in balls from set pieces than a winger that can be creative and put crosses in. Sounds like the Adams approach all over again. I guess Kaebi and Ferreira won't get much of a look-in this season.
Kent Fox Posted 18 September 2007 Posted 18 September 2007 but come on ; we were all thinking the same thing Not I.
FilboFox Posted 18 September 2007 Posted 18 September 2007 I'm just glad it was Mark who said it, cause I was pretty close to saying exactly the same thing... I think most people were... I was thinking it and about to head off to watch something crap on TV!
Basingstoke Fox Posted 18 September 2007 Posted 18 September 2007 Megson is a genius Cantanyone see this poor performance was all a ploy so that we could stun them in these last few moments jeez its so obvious!
Anish Posted 18 September 2007 Posted 18 September 2007 It shows something about his tactical mentality: he'd rather get a tall defender on that can head in balls from set pieces than a winger that can be creative and put crosses in. Sounds like the Adams approach all over again. I guess Kaebi and Ferreira won't get much of a look-in this season. He'll be given the boot if that's the case.
Nationwider Posted 18 September 2007 Posted 18 September 2007 He'll be given the boot if that's the case. There's a problem for him!
l444ry Posted 18 September 2007 Posted 18 September 2007 It shows something about his tactical mentality: he'd rather get a tall defender on that can head in balls from set pieces than a winger that can be creative and put crosses in. Sounds like the Adams approach all over again. I guess Kaebi and Ferreira won't get much of a look-in this season. And nothing to do with the fact that the player he replaced was an ageing 36 year old defender? Perhaps Megson should have left N'Gotty on the pitch so that he could sprint up the wing like a gazelle.
Eastern Fox Posted 18 September 2007 Posted 18 September 2007 And nothing to do with the fact that the player he replaced was an ageing 36 year old defender? Perhaps Megson should have left N'Gotty on the pitch so that he could sprint up the wing like a gazelle. If we're losing with minutes to spare, you'd think he'd replace a tired defender with an attacker, like our international winger Marco Ferreira, as Mark put it. Not another defender-that's my point.
Tommeh Posted 18 September 2007 Posted 18 September 2007 As much as I stated Megson's changes on saturday they worked out brilliantly tonight. Fryatt was magnificent when he came on, held the ball up, looked threatening set up the equaliser and played a part in the winner. Also stearman for N'Gotty worked well although as the time i'll admit I thought "oh my God"
Alexikokopops Posted 18 September 2007 Posted 18 September 2007 Goal by Richard Stearman (Leicester) left-footed (low centre of goal) from centre of penalty area (12 yards).Nottm Forest 2-2 Leicester. Assist (new thread) by Mark (FoxesTalk).
The Reverend Posted 18 September 2007 Posted 18 September 2007 As much as I stated Megson's changes on saturday they worked out brilliantly tonight. Fryatt was magnificent when he came on, held the ball up, looked threatening set up the equaliser and played a part in the winner.Also stearman for N'Gotty worked well although as the time i'll admit I thought "oh my God" Totally agree. Well done Fryatt - took your chance well lad, hopefully hes forced his way into the gaffers plans now.
trickytrees12 Posted 18 September 2007 Posted 18 September 2007 So we're 2-1 down and we bring on Stearman for N'Gotty, can anyone explain the logic in this change to me when we've got an International winger sitting on the bench?Unbelievable Its Typical. Megson IS negative even when his teams are losing. Bloody Tipically you scored from it. Don't worry you'll be defending 3-0 defeats in no time
l444ry Posted 18 September 2007 Posted 18 September 2007 Its Typical. Megson IS negative even when his teams are losing. Bloody Tipically you scored from it. Don't worry you'll be defending 3-0 defeats in no time Rather do that successfully than F****t who couldn't defend a lead with five minutes left.
Flynny Posted 18 September 2007 Posted 18 September 2007 I don't get why this was so awful. Three strikers on the pitch, one of whom is fresh. The big, old right-back is flagging and has had a mediocre game. Patching up a leaky part of the defence and injecting pace is going to assist the attack. As I've said already, it's not the most obvious substitution, but its not THAT hard to see why it was done.
Milky Posted 18 September 2007 Posted 18 September 2007 I'd guess it's because an attacking option of Marco was left on the bench.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.