Jonesy_rules Posted 15 March 2005 Posted 15 March 2005 I've noticed that swearing seems to be the norm in posts along here! any reason? or just a short vocabulary?
Guest Posted 15 March 2005 Posted 15 March 2005 If swearing was good enough for Chaucer, it's good enough for me! So feck off, JR!! PS: That last bit's a joke!
davieG Posted 15 March 2005 Posted 15 March 2005 I've noticed that swearing seems to be the norm in posts along here!any reason? or just a short vocabulary? 78627[/snapback] As with most things in life it depends on the context of use and the tone of delivery. There will be a boundary beyond which the majority will find the use of certain words and phases unacceptable. For myself, and I haven't made a formal complaint but I find Dan's current signature distasteful and insulting to me as a football supporter of LCFC and very much less acceptable than the occasional, jocular use of the words bloody or bugger for example.
kerryh Posted 15 March 2005 Posted 15 March 2005 Yes I agree, Dan change your signature it's neither big nor clever. The swearing issue, I hadn't really noticed a huge amount of bad language on here, but then I tend to skip through badly written posts.
Steven Posted 15 March 2005 Posted 15 March 2005 If swearing was good enough for Chaucer, it's good enough for me!So feck off, JR!! PS: That last bit's a joke! 78628[/snapback] Some of the things that happen in his Tales would not be allowed on the telly.
Katy Posted 15 March 2005 Posted 15 March 2005 I find people who can't construct a decent sentence more annoying than people who swear.
Benji Posted 15 March 2005 Posted 15 March 2005 If swearing was good enough for Chaucer, it's good enough for me! 78628[/snapback] hehe
Tomassi Posted 15 March 2005 Posted 15 March 2005 I find people who can't construct a decent sentence more annoying than people who swear. 78683[/snapback] u find me annoying??
stez Posted 15 March 2005 Posted 15 March 2005 surely swears are as valid as any other word? maybe we should all post in olde english or ancient germanic?
Tomassi Posted 15 March 2005 Posted 15 March 2005 where art thou shall come to thy neighbour and all that bollocks
stez Posted 15 March 2005 Posted 15 March 2005 where art thou shall come to thy neighbour and all that bollocks 78716[/snapback] it's yee nuts in olde english
Tomassi Posted 15 March 2005 Posted 15 March 2005 where art thou shall come to thy neighbour and all that bollocks 78716[/snapback] it's yee nuts in olde english 78719[/snapback] i never liked shakespear.. a silly fool who wrote plays.. why create such dumb stuff such as hamlet and romeo
stez Posted 15 March 2005 Posted 15 March 2005 if i'm right, i think 'spear is responsible for helping to create modern english olde english or germanic languages are what the saxons and angles from germany and holland spoke.......if i remember history properly
Alexikokopops Posted 15 March 2005 Posted 15 March 2005 I've noticed that swearing seems to be the norm in posts along here!any reason? or just a short vocabulary? 78627[/snapback] As with most things in life it depends on the context of use and the tone of delivery. There will be a boundary beyond which the majority will find the use of certain words and phases unacceptable. For myself, and I haven't made a formal complaint but I find Dan's current signature distasteful and insulting to me as a football supporter of LCFC and very much less acceptable than the occasional, jocular use of the words bloody or bugger for example. 78636[/snapback] What was Dan's signature?
Guest Daniel Posted 15 March 2005 Posted 15 March 2005 I've noticed that swearing seems to be the norm in posts along here!any reason? or just a short vocabulary? 78627[/snapback] As with most things in life it depends on the context of use and the tone of delivery. There will be a boundary beyond which the majority will find the use of certain words and phases unacceptable. For myself, and I haven't made a formal complaint but I find Dan's current signature distasteful and insulting to me as a football supporter of LCFC and very much less acceptable than the occasional, jocular use of the words bloody or bugger for example. 78636[/snapback] What was Dan's signature? 79003[/snapback] Leicesters Famous Babysquad
Scarby Posted 15 March 2005 Posted 15 March 2005 I've noticed that swearing seems to be the norm in posts along here!any reason? or just a short vocabulary? 78627[/snapback] As with most things in life it depends on the context of use and the tone of delivery. There will be a boundary beyond which the majority will find the use of certain words and phases unacceptable. For myself, and I haven't made a formal complaint but I find Dan's current signature distasteful and insulting to me as a football supporter of LCFC and very much less acceptable than the occasional, jocular use of the words bloody or bugger for example. 78636[/snapback] What was Dan's signature? 79003[/snapback] something to do with the baby squad i believe
Guest Posted 16 March 2005 Posted 16 March 2005 i never liked shakespear.. a silly fool who wrote plays.. why create such dumb stuff such as hamlet and romeo 78722[/snapback] He didn't, he plagarised most of 'his' works.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.