Jonesy_rules Posted 15 March 2005 Share Posted 15 March 2005 I've noticed that swearing seems to be the norm in posts along here! any reason? or just a short vocabulary? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted 15 March 2005 Share Posted 15 March 2005 If swearing was good enough for Chaucer, it's good enough for me! So feck off, JR!! PS: That last bit's a joke! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Daniel Posted 15 March 2005 Share Posted 15 March 2005 What a ****ing stupid thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davieG Posted 15 March 2005 Share Posted 15 March 2005 I've noticed that swearing seems to be the norm in posts along here!any reason? or just a short vocabulary? 78627[/snapback] As with most things in life it depends on the context of use and the tone of delivery. There will be a boundary beyond which the majority will find the use of certain words and phases unacceptable. For myself, and I haven't made a formal complaint but I find Dan's current signature distasteful and insulting to me as a football supporter of LCFC and very much less acceptable than the occasional, jocular use of the words bloody or bugger for example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerryh Posted 15 March 2005 Share Posted 15 March 2005 Yes I agree, Dan change your signature it's neither big nor clever. The swearing issue, I hadn't really noticed a huge amount of bad language on here, but then I tend to skip through badly written posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Posted 15 March 2005 Share Posted 15 March 2005 If swearing was good enough for Chaucer, it's good enough for me!So feck off, JR!! PS: That last bit's a joke! 78628[/snapback] Some of the things that happen in his Tales would not be allowed on the telly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katy Posted 15 March 2005 Share Posted 15 March 2005 I find people who can't construct a decent sentence more annoying than people who swear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benji Posted 15 March 2005 Share Posted 15 March 2005 If swearing was good enough for Chaucer, it's good enough for me! 78628[/snapback] hehe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomassi Posted 15 March 2005 Share Posted 15 March 2005 I find people who can't construct a decent sentence more annoying than people who swear. 78683[/snapback] u find me annoying?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stez Posted 15 March 2005 Share Posted 15 March 2005 surely swears are as valid as any other word? maybe we should all post in olde english or ancient germanic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomassi Posted 15 March 2005 Share Posted 15 March 2005 where art thou shall come to thy neighbour and all that bollocks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stez Posted 15 March 2005 Share Posted 15 March 2005 where art thou shall come to thy neighbour and all that bollocks 78716[/snapback] it's yee nuts in olde english Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomassi Posted 15 March 2005 Share Posted 15 March 2005 where art thou shall come to thy neighbour and all that bollocks 78716[/snapback] it's yee nuts in olde english 78719[/snapback] i never liked shakespear.. a silly fool who wrote plays.. why create such dumb stuff such as hamlet and romeo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stez Posted 15 March 2005 Share Posted 15 March 2005 if i'm right, i think 'spear is responsible for helping to create modern english olde english or germanic languages are what the saxons and angles from germany and holland spoke.......if i remember history properly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexikokopops Posted 15 March 2005 Share Posted 15 March 2005 I've noticed that swearing seems to be the norm in posts along here!any reason? or just a short vocabulary? 78627[/snapback] As with most things in life it depends on the context of use and the tone of delivery. There will be a boundary beyond which the majority will find the use of certain words and phases unacceptable. For myself, and I haven't made a formal complaint but I find Dan's current signature distasteful and insulting to me as a football supporter of LCFC and very much less acceptable than the occasional, jocular use of the words bloody or bugger for example. 78636[/snapback] What was Dan's signature? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Daniel Posted 15 March 2005 Share Posted 15 March 2005 I've noticed that swearing seems to be the norm in posts along here!any reason? or just a short vocabulary? 78627[/snapback] As with most things in life it depends on the context of use and the tone of delivery. There will be a boundary beyond which the majority will find the use of certain words and phases unacceptable. For myself, and I haven't made a formal complaint but I find Dan's current signature distasteful and insulting to me as a football supporter of LCFC and very much less acceptable than the occasional, jocular use of the words bloody or bugger for example. 78636[/snapback] What was Dan's signature? 79003[/snapback] Leicesters Famous Babysquad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarby Posted 15 March 2005 Share Posted 15 March 2005 I've noticed that swearing seems to be the norm in posts along here!any reason? or just a short vocabulary? 78627[/snapback] As with most things in life it depends on the context of use and the tone of delivery. There will be a boundary beyond which the majority will find the use of certain words and phases unacceptable. For myself, and I haven't made a formal complaint but I find Dan's current signature distasteful and insulting to me as a football supporter of LCFC and very much less acceptable than the occasional, jocular use of the words bloody or bugger for example. 78636[/snapback] What was Dan's signature? 79003[/snapback] something to do with the baby squad i believe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted 16 March 2005 Share Posted 16 March 2005 i never liked shakespear.. a silly fool who wrote plays.. why create such dumb stuff such as hamlet and romeo 78722[/snapback] He didn't, he plagarised most of 'his' works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted 16 March 2005 Share Posted 16 March 2005 Some people like swearing, Some people like moaning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_lcfc Posted 16 March 2005 Share Posted 16 March 2005 shut the Donald Duck up swearing is gr8. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.