If you had to pick one, who was your favourite?

[Mickey O'Neil]

Fcuk..tough one, but Pontus edges it for me. Thinking about it, I was actually quite gutted when he went.

[Fatbloke]

Pontus for me, was a real class act, Juninio loved him too !

[The People's Hero]

Pontus Kamark was IMMENSE.

Don't get me wrong, I love Theo - but it's got to be Pontus.

[CosbehFox]

Kaamark - Incredibly under-rated across the World. He was superb for us. In fact one of the finest footballers we've had.

Theo - Great player, suffered from City having a cracking midfield at the time.

What we do for them now to be squad and ulitity players.

[Lillehamring]

Pontus Kaamark was the better player but Theo wins it for me for the simple reason he managed to pull this:

well played young man, well played!

what, a bird with a hairy chest?

[lavrentis]

Thanks mate,

[Father Ted]

Theo, purely for the comedy factor.

[dandannieldanok]

Kaamark was the better player so I preferred him but Zagorakis always gave 100% which gets my respect.

[Ultra]

Pontus.

His debut for us at West Brom was awesome. How McGhee got him to sign for us was one of the greatest mysteries of the time.

Especially as we lost 3-1 at home to Southend on the day he signed.

[Sparky]

Pontus.

His debut for us at West Brom was awesome. How McGhee got him to sign for us was one of the greatest mysteries of the time.

Especially as we lost 3-1 at home to Southend on the day he signed.

Was always gonna happen as soon as we unveiled him before kick off . How we beat West Brom 3-2 was a mystery as it was also Kalac s debut and he was throwing them in !!!

[Nationwider]

Pontus Kaamark, without a doubt.

Poor Theo. One of a select group of players to have been kept out of a first team by Robbie Savage.