Thracian Posted 24 January 2009 Posted 24 January 2009 After so much flippant dismissal of my comment that Labour policies were acting as a recruiting call for the BNP it seems that, while she may not get the reasons, at least Ms H understands the threat. It does seem funny though that a member of the most anti-white Government I can ever remember should talk about the BNP being blatantly racist. As a representative or an organisation that seems to so hate, undermine and ill-use the long-standing native population way beyong any other, I cannot believe the hypocrisy. But how predictable she should use the Obama election to try to gain political points. In other words, if you're not pushing for a blacks first, second and last agenda, you're out of touch and an arsehole. It was well predicted and conveniently ignores the fact that hundreds of thousands of once employed, hard-working natives are complaining every day how they are out of work, out of money, up to the eyeballs in debt and feeling abandoned. Do us and the country a favour Ms Harman. Sod off and take Gordon "Shit Is" Brown and Meddlesome Mandelson with you. And lets find a government that will look after our native population (of all colours) with provide each with the opportunities to live a fulfilled, happy and included life. http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20090124/tuk-h...ry-6323e80.html
Webbo Posted 24 January 2009 Posted 24 January 2009 The Labour party are talking up the BNP vote so they can claim a victory when the BNP fail to get a seat. I doubt if the BNP vote will be much different to last time.
Thracian Posted 25 January 2009 Author Posted 25 January 2009 The Labour party are talking up the BNP vote so they can claim a victory when the BNP fail to get a seat. That's very reassuring all round. :D
JadeFalcon Posted 25 January 2009 Posted 25 January 2009 u ever wonder why labour are letting so many foriengers in ? its the only ****ers that will vote for them any more, wouldnt you vote for somebody that gave you a country to live in, a house, a job, and perks on top ? always said labour should be removing people to give the native people of this country jobs, feed your own first ? if your an english male in this country you really are fooked
Ross-Kemp Posted 25 January 2009 Posted 25 January 2009 u ever wonder why labour are letting so many foriengers in ?its the only ****ers that will vote for them any more, wouldnt you vote for somebody that gave you a country to live in, a house, a job, and perks on top ? always said labour should be removing people to give the native people of this country jobs, feed your own first ? if your an english male in this country you really are fooked
Thracian Posted 25 January 2009 Author Posted 25 January 2009 u ever wonder why labour are letting so many foriengers in ?its the only ****ers that will vote for them any more, wouldnt you vote for somebody that gave you a country to live in, a house, a job, and perks on top ? if your an english male in this country you really are fooked I'd never thought of that!
JadeFalcon Posted 25 January 2009 Posted 25 January 2009 my opinion is the world is for everybody, but in times of need something has to be done
Edmund Posted 25 January 2009 Posted 25 January 2009 u ever wonder why labour are letting so many foriengers in ?its the only ****ers that will vote for them any more, wouldnt you vote for somebody that gave you a country to live in, a house, a job, and perks on top ? always said labour should be removing people to give the native people of this country jobs, feed your own first ? if your an english male in this country you really are fooked
Thracian Posted 25 January 2009 Author Posted 25 January 2009 Enter Lisa, stage right. Anyone without a tin hat and flak jacket should be very afrrrrraid. :w00t:
JadeFalcon Posted 25 January 2009 Posted 25 January 2009 whistle all you want, but if your parents were born here, then you've earned the right to be here but then again this argument has been done before and it will never end
Finnegan Posted 25 January 2009 Posted 25 January 2009 There's probably nothing I hate more than alarmist, right-wing reporting. Except the sort of common idiot that buys into alarmist, right-wing reporting.
Thracian Posted 25 January 2009 Author Posted 25 January 2009 whistle all you want, but if your parents were born here, then you've earned the right to be herebut then again this argument has been done before and it will never end No-one's stopping em being here (just yet). It's just a job, the same consideration/opportunities as others, and shelter from being victimised that so many of them are missing...
Guest Posted 25 January 2009 Posted 25 January 2009 u ever wonder why labour are letting so many foriengers in ?its the only ****ers that will vote for them any more, wouldnt you vote for somebody that gave you a country to live in, a house, a job, and perks on top ? always said labour should be removing people to give the native people of this country jobs, feed your own first ? if your an english male in this country you really are fooked Did you get this from out of The Sun? It's just you don't have the punctuation for a Daily Mail reader.
Corky Posted 25 January 2009 Posted 25 January 2009 Anyone without a tin hat and flak jacket should be very afrrrrraid. :w00t: She's timid really
Edmund Posted 25 January 2009 Posted 25 January 2009 whistle all you want, but if your parents were born here, then you've earned the right to be herebut then again this argument has been done before and it will never end Don't take it personally mate just couldn't make out what you were trying to say. Just wondered what you meant by "removing people". But like you said these arguments usually go round in circles. Also what happens if only one of your parents are born here?
Guest Posted 25 January 2009 Posted 25 January 2009 She's timid really She also can't be arsed to get into another immigration argument with a load of ignorant, right-wing idealists who think that illegal immigration is going to be solved by stopping anyone entering the UK, and that people fleeing persecution ought to fend for themselves anywhere but here, I mean, who do these people think they are? The nerve.....
Corky Posted 25 January 2009 Posted 25 January 2009 She also can't be arsed to get into another immigration argument with a load of ignorant, right-wing idealists who think that illegal immigration is going to be solved by stopping anyone entering the UK, and that people fleeing persecution ought to fend for themselves anywhere but here, I mean, who do these people think they are? The nerve..... Shingler can be argumentative can't he?
Thracian Posted 25 January 2009 Author Posted 25 January 2009 There's probably nothing I hate more than alarmist, right-wing reporting.Except the sort of common idiot that buys into alarmist, right-wing reporting. Being a proud Welshman from the Left-wing stronghold of the Valleys why would anyone be surprised about that?
Fosse Boy Posted 25 January 2009 Posted 25 January 2009 Did you get this from out of The Sun? It's just you don't have the punctuation for a Daily Mail reader.
Thracian Posted 25 January 2009 Author Posted 25 January 2009 She also can't be arsed to get into another immigration argument with a load of ignorant, right-wing idealists who think that illegal immigration is going to be solved by stopping anyone entering the UK, and that people fleeing persecution ought to fend for themselves anywhere but here, I mean, who do these people think they are? The nerve..... a) Illegal immigration to this country should be stopped. It is rampant. You've never seemed strong on anyone here doing anything illegal. So why should it be a problem?. b) And why should such people as are allowed in go to the top of housing lists and get jobseeker advantages that aren't available to others here whose world has also collapsed about them through no fault of their own? Three million unemployed coming up! Crime already on the increase again. People despairing over their debts. When will you accept that we're living way beyond our means and say "enough". We won't be able to help anyone, anywhere when we run out of money and credibility but Gordon Brown carries on regardless, as blinded as his followers to the great harm that he is doing. c) It's a great pity that disgusting Marxist regimes like Mugabe's continue. But many of the countries the refugees come from didn't want our governance. They wanted their independence and their own leaders and why not? Well they've got their independence and their own leaders. Now it's up to them to make something of their countries and to fight for their rights, for their welfare and for fair and just government like we had to do in the past and some of us try to do now. Way back in our history we had hangings for petty crimes, debtors prisons and deportation. There's nothing new in people suffering and having to fight for a better life. Of course we should take our share of the burden when, on proper examination, the basic human rights to life is genuinely under threat. But our charity should not be at the cost of endless suffering by native people....those who cannot get jobs because there aren't any or because of ethnic discrimination against them, or who cannot get houses for their own families because ethnic needs have to be catered for first or who cannot do anything about spiralling into ever deeper debt making them ever-more desperate as a result. Already there are the first signs that crime is starting to rise and no matter how much the Labour Party hide, subdue or doctor the figures that will continue. Yet still the heads of Left-wing idealists remain in the sand. Although the crisis is growing and the crisis is obvious, it is still nothing to do with them. It is all someone else's fault says sell-the-gold Gordon. Helping people requires money yet this socialist government has wasted so much that could have been spent easing humanitarian suffering it is embarrassing and half the time they have spent it on causing more humanitarian suffering. I really cannot believe that anyone can still defend such arseholes. Nor can I understand how giving a foreign refugee life-saving sanctiuary, education and a job if in consequence a native man loses his job, loses his home, tumbles into a spiral of debt and eventually kills himself in despair, cos it's already happened, and a lot more than once, and I guarantee it's going to happen some more. . But then I don't believe the Government is especially bothered about people losing their homes. There's a desperate need social housing and if the government increasingly owns the banks they'll increasing own the snatchbacks too. And how convenient is that? Not only will they be able to give the natives' jobs away or allow them to disappear while continuing to chuck money and lives away on interminable and pointless warfare, but they'll be able to give their houses away as well. And how many ethnic votes will that be worth? Coupled with the Valleys votes, the diehard Scottish socialists from Grodon's own land and the traditional "red flag" Britons who would rather be labelled scabs than ever vote against Labour, they might yet achieve the incredible and retain power. But if there's any danger I wouldn't be surprised if the goalposts were moved in some incredible way.
Ultra Posted 25 January 2009 Posted 25 January 2009 There's probably nothing I hate more than alarmist, right-wing reporting.Except the sort of common idiot that buys into alarmist, right-wing reporting. Too many folk on here who should know better are all too eager to believe (and indeed spread) BNP bullsh!t.
Ultra Posted 25 January 2009 Posted 25 January 2009 Did you get this from out of The Sun? It's just you don't have the punctuation for a Daily Mail reader. It's strange how the most passionately "pro-English" posters are also the ones who take most liberties with the language..
Thracian Posted 25 January 2009 Author Posted 25 January 2009 Too many folk on here who should know better are all too eager to believe (and indeed spread) BNP bullsh!t. And there's at least one on here who would like the Labour Party to start caring for this country first and start treating ALL the people in it fairly so that the potential lifeblood of the BNP is watered down to nothing.
Ultra Posted 25 January 2009 Posted 25 January 2009 a) Illegal immigration to this country should be stopped. It is rampant What's your evidence for this, other than speculation in pro-BNP publications? b) And why should such people as are allowed in go to the top of housing lists and get jobseeker advantages that aren't available to others here whose world has also collapsed about them through no fault of their own? Again, what evidence do you have to say this is happening?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.