Salieri Posted 9 July 2010 Posted 9 July 2010 By following Edmunds post with another anti Mandaric rant, you're only re-enforcing his point.
Matt Posted 9 July 2010 Posted 9 July 2010 By following Edmunds post with another anti Mandaric rant, you're only re-enforcing his point. TBH what can I say, I am anti Mandaric ain't I? I ain't denying it, just saying i'm by far not the worst.
Edmund Posted 9 July 2010 Posted 9 July 2010 Yeah cos i'm the only one. And don't give me the "Yeah but you consistently, every post post the comments" because many other people have been more anti-Mandaric, have slagged him off more, and gone into detail about his finances and how much he supports the club i.e Finances and do this regularly, I only do it when he does something wrong and it's quite clear he has been wrong now, what has been done is done and we'll move on but he deserves the slagging off at the moment and hope to god he's out of the club soon - Where we end up after him is worrying but under his ownership is quite worrying tbh - Who is he going to upset next? It's not a case of who's more anti Mandaric. I've seen a lot of anti Mandaric posts but in most cases they've justified their arguments with genuine reasons whereas yours is just sensationalist conspiracy theories (propaganda) to feed your hatred. Everyone's entitled to their opinions and I respect that but you're ramblings are made up bollocks (see below). If you had actually read the thread you'd have saved yourself the hassle of looking like a dick. Or was it a Mandaric signing? Although if it was a Mandaric signing i'd expect it to be a much bigger high profile name, but the way I see it and have heard Sousa been in weeks, it was just a case of getting rid of Pearson. Perhaps Sousa told Mandaric he wanted Kennedy and Mandaric got him in? But I believe Pearson was out soon after the playoff's but not officially - It was a case of getting another job and if thats the case why would A) Pearson bother bringing new players in and B) If Mandaric knew he was getting rid of Pearson why would Mandaric agree to the signing? You can come up with many conspiricy theorys, They may not be true but i'd imagine i'm not a million miles away from the truth.
Flynny Posted 10 July 2010 Posted 10 July 2010 To be fair I think that if it was a good Steve Walsh spot and Mandaric was happy to sign the kid up even though he already knew he'd be giving him and Pearson the boot, it reflects far worse on him. No need to resort to all that 'conspiracy theory' stuff and it still makes Milan out to be a colossal wang.
Babylon Posted 10 July 2010 Posted 10 July 2010 Or maybe, just maybe.... he thought NP would be here and backed his signing.
Sods Posted 11 July 2010 Posted 11 July 2010 Steve Walsh and Craig Shakespeare thank you, this lad hopefully will come good and will reflect how much work you did for Leicester City.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.