TheUltimateWinner Posted 6 April 2013 Posted 6 April 2013 No - Our inability to kill them off cost us, cannot blame Pearson for that. Surely scoring against them once is enough to be classed as 'killing them off' We did the dirty work, now let's just focus on defending.
Babylon Posted 6 April 2013 Posted 6 April 2013 Bad management second half. Don't know why we were setup like that after scoring the goal and seems like the subs were a little suspect. I'm usually all for Pearson and have been for a while but it seems like he's lost the plot to me. I'm still waiting for someone to explain how they contributed to their goal exactly?
breadandcheese Posted 6 April 2013 Posted 6 April 2013 I'm still a Pearson fan, but I don't understand the substitutions. Why make the same substitutions you were going to make at 0-0, when you go 1 up?
GingerrrFox Posted 6 April 2013 Posted 6 April 2013 Kane should have stopped the cross for LuaLua's goal! Not good enough from him, he never should have come on.
Babylon Posted 6 April 2013 Posted 6 April 2013 Pearson cost us that by bringing Kane on for Schlupp. Explain?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.