Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
HEGGSY

St Ledger to leave. Confirms he hasn't been offered new deal on Twitter

Recommended Posts

Posted

Neville said this not me .

"Now we have the extra bit added as well, player acquisitions.

"It is arguably one of the key things that happen at a football club.

"If you get your acquisitions right you should be successful. Get them wrong and you won't be successful, and it will end up costing you quite a lot of money.

"That is what we are trying to focus on now, to get the right acquisitions to help make us successful next season."

Although City have yet to make a new signing, Neville said there had been a lot of hard work done to identify targets and open negotiations, and said his efforts should soon bear fruit.

and his efforts bore to fruit alright didn't they !

Oh my God. What, for crying out loud, is all this about? Mumbo jumbo to me mate. :unsure::unsure:

Posted

Oh my God. What, for crying out loud, is all this about? Mumbo jumbo to me mate. :unsure::unsure:

Dangerous, meet James Milner... in fact I'm starting to think he's behind Boring James Milner on Twitter.

Posted

to the thick twats on this thread it would have been andrew neville who would have agreed st ledgers wages not sven just like the other signings that season so get that into your ****ing heads . do you lot think nigel pearson tells players who he signs the amount of money they will be on

Someone clearly shat in buzzy's bran flakes on the 29th.

Posted

From who then? I can't wait to hear this. Honestly, who is better qualified than the manager, who oversees the entire footballing side of the club, to give advice on how much a player is worth in terms of transfer fees, or wages, or in terms of a new contract? Of course the manager is involved! I'm not saying that the manager says 'pay him x amount', but they will almost certainly advise and consult with the money men on how much to pay a certain player as they have a much, much better idea of value than some suit in the boardroom. How does someone like Andrew Neville decide what someone like Riyad Mahrez is worth? Or Aleksander Tunchev? These are players he's probably never even heard of before the manager suggests them. Who has more idea of their value? The bloke who probably has to Google them to find out who they are, or the manager whose scouting team have been watching the player for months? How does someone like Andrew Neville have enough knowledge of the changing room mood to know if a big money signing will damage morale? He doesn't. The manager does.

And if the manager plays no role whatsoever in how much we pay for players, or what contracts they are given, how on earth do you explain the seismic shift in financial policy that happened almost immediately after Sven left and Pearson rejoined? Why did we suddenly go from paying astronomical amounts for average players to making considered, value-for-money signings? Do you honestly think it's just a coincidence that when we had a manager renowned for spending absolute fortunes in charge we spent an absolute fortune, yet when a frugal, careful manager comes in we adopt a frugal, careful financial policy?

There's none so blind as those who refuse to see.

Sorry to hear you're blind, geezer.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...