Sir Fynwy Posted 20 January 2015 Posted 20 January 2015 10% + 2mphExactly, the guidelines for prosecution on a 70mph section state that people shouldn't be prosecuted at under 79mph in normal circumstances
Bellend Sebastian Posted 20 January 2015 Posted 20 January 2015 10% + 2mph Exactly, the guidelines for prosecution on a 70mph section state that people shouldn't be prosecuted at under 79mph in normal circumstances Yeah, I've seen that quoted before, but is it universally applied? I know this isn't motorway cameras, but ages ago, I heard that speed cameras in Leicester were calibrated to be triggered at +20%, more generous than elsewhere, and this seemed to be borne out by the fines my friends were getting - nobody seemed to get caught doing less than 36 in 30 or 48 in a 40. No idea if this was true or is still the case. I'd be a bit wary of testing the margins, so to speak, but then again, I've always been a cautious cat
DB11 Posted 20 January 2015 Posted 20 January 2015 Yeah, I've seen that quoted before, but is it universally applied? I know this isn't motorway cameras, but ages ago, I heard that speed cameras in Leicester were calibrated to be triggered at +20%, more generous than elsewhere, and this seemed to be borne out by the fines my friends were getting - nobody seemed to get caught doing less than 36 in 30 or 48 in a 40. No idea if this was true or is still the case. I'd be a bit wary of testing the margins, so to speak, but then again, I've always been a cautious cat I know the officers that are standing at the side of the road with a speed gun can give you words of advice for any speed over the limit and up to 10%+2 but as soon as its that limit they can report you as otherwise the prosecution wouldn't be supported. And I got done at 58 in a 50 in 2011, which is less than the 20% you mention.
Bellend Sebastian Posted 20 January 2015 Posted 20 January 2015 I know the officers that are standing at the side of the road with a speed gun can give you words of advice for any speed over the limit and up to 10%+2 but as soon as its that limit they can report you as otherwise the prosecution wouldn't be supported. And I got done at 58 in a 50 in 2011, which is less than the 20% you mention. It was a long time ago that I heard about the 20 per cent thing. Maybe it was the case but they've tightened up since, which is the way it usually goes, isn't it?
yorkie1999 Posted 20 January 2015 Posted 20 January 2015 I know the officers that are standing at the side of the road with a speed gun can give you words of advice for any speed over the limit and up to 10%+2 but as soon as its that limit they can report you as otherwise the prosecution wouldn't be supported. And I got done at 58 in a 50 in 2011, which is less than the 20% you mention. Thats a coincidence, i've been done for 58 in a 50. Something dodgy going on there.
davieG Posted 20 January 2015 Author Posted 20 January 2015 MrsG got a ticket for doing 34 in a 30 limit which was snuck in between a 40 and 20 limit entering some rural Sussex village at 7.30 on a Sunday Morning when we didn't see another car for about 5 miles.
ADK Posted 20 January 2015 Posted 20 January 2015 Legally you can be done for doing 30.001 mph. The 2mph is the tolerance for speed detection. The 10% is a bit of leeway usually granted when setting speed camera thresholds. It should also be noted that car speedometers must not under read, so they actually over read by at least a few mph.
Webbo Posted 20 January 2015 Posted 20 January 2015 I did a speed awareness course last week. Apparently there is no set rule for at what speed they prosecute you for. Different forces have different criteria.
potter3 Posted 20 January 2015 Posted 20 January 2015 When I did the speed awareness course they said Leicestershire is 10% +2mph, other forces may well be different as Webbo said.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.