Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Happy Fox

Member
  • Posts

    20,925
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Happy Fox

  1. We need new ownership, nothing will change with Top at the helm and Rudkin as DOF.
  2. Incompetence to the highest degree both him and Top.
  3. And Top hasn’t… and is unlikely to do so. We aren’t going to move forward as a club without new ownership imo.
  4. Top and Rudkin are both culpable for the mess we are in, we need new ownership, that’s not an over reaction that’s just reality. I have no idea who would be interested, but facts are we need new ownership, and a clear footballing identity.
  5. How about Top?
  6. It’s obvious the message is to the board, Enzo will be off as soon as a decent offer comes in. The sooner Top sells the club and Rudkin is flushed out the better.
  7. Shit show FC
  8. This still not done yet
  9. Souttar is below Nelson in the pecking order with Coady, Faes, Jannick and Nelson not to mention Doyle we are fine for cover.
  10. I wouldn’t be fussed tbh, with Cannon , Vardy and Nacho we will be okay upfront. Fulham’s first target is Broja but I guess Daka is there back up if that deal doesn’t go ahead.
  11. Leeds aren’t going to finish in the Top 2 at our expense.
  12. Maybe Birmingham or Stoke on loan @Sambiasso?
  13. I think the message is clearly to the board not to the fans. It’s very unprofessional if we have the likes of Rudkin on the jolly at Top’s wedding. I am not saying it’s not okay to attend but at least have back up staff that can do the tasks for transfers.. it’s so unprofessional we are reliant on one individual to do this. No wonder Enzo is pissed.
  14. It’s crazy we don’t have any delegated staff to do this if people are away.. in any business you have a back up staff that can do the tasks.. Leicester City on the other hand
  15. Sooner the club is sold the better, but to who is the question, could end up in a shitty predicament.
  16. We will still go up automatically without KDH, we would finish 2nd. We aren’t finishing in the playoffs.
  17. Not exactly confident if Brighton do bid £32m do we accept it?
  18. There forum is a barrel of laughs would be nice to hammer the Stokies.
  19. Another comfortable win, just 7 more wins to get 90 points
  20. We have all but secured the playoffs now, that’s insane at this stage.
  21. Dewsbury-Hall interestpublished at 13:11 13:11 Simon Stone BBC Sport It's transfer deadline day week and we are still waiting for the kind of deal that might trigger a few more. The Premier League's Profit and Sustainability rules - and the charges that have followed for Nottingham Forest and Everton - seem to have focussed minds amongst club executives, which explains the relative lack of business. One to keep an eye on is Leicester's Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall. It is a quirk of the P&S rules that selling your own players, who cost nothing, is a better way of creating space in your accounts to buy players. Selling Dewsbury-Hall would help Leicester fund Enzo Maresca's demand to strengthen his squad for the second half of the season given one of the reasons the Foxes ended up in trouble last term was because they were too close to breaching P&S for comfort. Brighton are interested in Dewsbury-Hall but Leicester are yet to fully commit to selling the 25-year-old.
  22. No chance we are demanding 40m that’s us trying to save face with our fans he will go for 32m is my prediction imo
  23. Surely you need booking history?
×
×
  • Create New...