Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

kingpower

Member
  • Posts

    632
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by kingpower

  1. Heavy defeat on Sunday and I think he might be gone. If there’s any encouragement from Dyche’s camp then I double down on that
  2. Dyche would be very disappointed when he realises there's a lack of pound notes available
  3. it's funny this but it's so true! Last week the fans were slating Son, they'll be singing his name on Sunday when he nets his hat-trick
  4. Can't blame the guy if he walks (although you don't often hear of manager's resigning these days) I'm sure he came he with the personal objective of increasing his reputation as a PL manager and currently he's doing the opposite (although not his fault).
  5. should have been who we brought in last summer for half the price of Skipp He's a young, Dutch international and the fact that West Ham are in for him suggests he's caught the eye
  6. We wouldn’t have been in the running for this despite reports as we have Facundo already from Brighton
  7. Especially given we have Winks. Too similar a player and given our budget restrictions it was criminal we signed him instead of a striker
  8. Obviously it’s not his fault we paid £20m+ for him but he’s done nothing to justify that price tag. He doesn’t seem to have any obvious strength in his play
  9. If it’s personal issues then get it sorted quickly and move on as he’ll never settle. Whatever happened to our recruitment approach that looked beyond the stats, found the leaders, the lads with strong personality (Fuchs, Wasilevski, Kasper, Huth…could go on and on, and none of those lads would ever have cried about moving country) - we’re just a shadow of our former selves when it comes to bringing in the right personalities
  10. I actually thought that myself last night regarding throw ins. Was getting so frustrated watching all the players run away from the man holding the ball…utter turd
  11. The players aren’t good enough lads. Look at the shite that came off the bench. Not Ruud’s fault
  12. Can someone explain what the f***k we thought we were getting with Skipp. He’s absolute dross, offers nothing at all chuck in the fact he runs around the pitch with his tongue hanging our like a spaz
  13. This is a hard watch. When Palace attack their forward 3 are close together and all supporting each other. When we attack Vardy is miles further forward and our other attacking players are nowhere to be seen
  14. The GOAT being wasteful tonight 😬
  15. Both Cooper and RVN have thought ‘nahhh’ get him gone and move on
  16. Exactly, sell him whilst he’s hot and scoring goals. You’ve got to think that Enzo knows a good player and he didn’t fancy him at all
  17. Good morning everyone, and welcome to PSR week. The Premier League is expected to announce today which clubs are facing charges for breaking Profitability and Sustainability Rules (PSR) in the 2021-24 reporting cycle, and talking to various people who know more than we do about this sort of stuff it sounds increasingly likely that they’ve all found ways to comply. The biggest question from interested observers is how on earth Leicester City are going to come in under the line. The Foxes displayed their vulpine cunning in avoiding a sanction last year despite breaching the PSR limit by nearly £25m, with Nick DeMarco KC helping them get off a charge after they moved their accounting year and were deemed to no longer be under the jurisdiction of the Premier League after their relegation. Some expect Leicester to find a buyer for their old training ground or another land parcel they own, but it may not even be necessary. While owners and fans in the top two divisions (as well as football finance nerds) are waiting with baited breath, there is intrigue over what is increasingly forecast to be a lucky escape, with the club privately expressing considerable confidence that they will not be charged. Leicester have already narrowly avoided one PSR charge - and an inevitable points deduction given the Everton and Nottingham Forest precedents - this season. The club were charged by the Premier League with breaching their £105m three-year loss limit by £24.4m for the 2020-23 period last March, but the case was never heard. (During seasons spent in the EFL, that £35m-a-year threshold is reduced to £18m.) News of Leicester’s fate is eagerly awaited After launching an appeal, DeMarco and Leicester's lawyers persuaded an independent commission that as they were relegated at the end of the 2022-23 season they were not a Premier League club when they submitted their accounts 30 June 2023, so could not be charged. With that previous, if unpunished, £24.4m overshoot hanging over them, Leicester's finances remain stretched following pre-tax losses for the last two years of £92.5m and £90m, before removing the infrastructure spending and other costs that are deductible for PSR purposes. Football finance expert Kieron O’Connor, who has written the well-regarded Swiss Ramble blog since before PSR was even a twinkle in the Premier League's eye, has forecast that despite raising £75m through player sales last summer, Leicester will be around £12m in breach. With Leicester bullish of avoiding a breach on the eve of the announcement, there are all sorts of rumours doing the rounds about how they may have done so, such as the sale of property assets in a manner previously exploited by Chelsea, whose own compliance with PSR over this period is likely to be highly contingent on last summer's sale of their women's team to a sister company, Blue Co 22, and how it is assessed by the league. A more straightforward explanation for Leicester's confidence however is the possibility that their retained counsel may have identified another legal loophole which entitles Leicester to claim the full £35m allowance in their first season back in the Premier League. This possibility was first highlighted on X by an Everton fan last September and was written about extensively by The Athletic's Matt Slater this weekend. That theoretical extra cushion could be hugely significant for Leicester, and enable them to escape a PSR charge despite being significantly over what was assumed to be the threshold for the second successive season. That Everton account spotted an apparent inconsistency in the Premier League handbook, which states that a club's PSR allowance “will be reduced by £22m for each season covered by T-1 and T-2 for which the club was in membership of the Football League.” T-1 and T-2 refer to the first two seasons of the PSR accounting period, but there is no mention in the Premier League handbook of the PSR threshold being reduced in the event of EFL membership in the most recent season, T. The Premier League rulebook is once again under the microscope No-one at the Premier League was willing to comment or even discuss this issue yesterday, but the consensus from sports lawyers canvassed by FootBiz was that any anomaly was an oversight rather than a deliberate policy. This apparent anomaly has not arisen before, as no club recently promoted to the Premier League has been in danger of a PSR breach, so the size of the allowance has not been particularly relevant. While Forest were charged (and ultimately docked four points) as a result of their post-promotion spending splurge in the summer of 2022, the charges were not issued until the 2023-24 season, making their promotion season T-1. Forest are among the clubs monitoring the Premier League's actions with interest, and will be seriously unhappy if Leicester have benefitted from a bigger PSR allowance due to an ambiguous rulebook. Ipswich are also unlikely to be thrilled at discovering that they could have spent more on transfer fees following promotion last summer, as they were working to a PSR threshold of £39m for the last three years based on two seasons in League One and one in the Championship. For their part, the EFL rules are clearly set out in Appendix 5 of their handbook that the loss limit is £13m in the Championship, but it is the Premier League who are enforcing the rules in this instance. For the second time in less than six months poorly drafted rules may have condemned them to an embarrassing defeat. We expect to know by the end of play today… but there’s lots of other news too, including some more fun in France, rivals protesting Barcelona’s rule-bending and a lot more besides.
  18. I’d imagine if we get an interesting offer in Jan they will accept it
  19. Basically my life in the early 2000’s
  20. did I read somewhere that Parma are interested in one of our players?
  21. the kid has some pace
  22. Poundland JJ
  23. https://x.com/DiMarzio/status/1877757369540649283 translated: Coulibaly at Parma moves to Leicester
×
×
  • Create New...