dmayne7

This is a great example of how you get to a certain level in life, and you'll fall into jobs of a similar stature, no matter your skills/performance. Anybody (in a higher position) associated with the commercial team since the title win must be absolutely dreadful at their job given we've never capitalised on then commercially, and then all the recent issues.

Exactly. Being an international coach and a club manager are 2 very different jobs.

Oi! That's 2 posts in a row of yours I've seen that are absolutely spot on. Make sure your next one is absolute nonsense as you're not allowed such a good hit rate on here.

Completely agree with this. A club that does this pretty well (though home kit a bit out there this year), is Gillingham. Had some cracking kits in the last few years and the third kits are generally love or hate

Though if he's on more than £50k a week with a year left, that would also save £2.5m on the expenditure (assuming wages can't be subject to amortisation). I'm guessing it will still be a couple of mill as a transfer fee

But as @Bilo says, for as cack as it is, we've still got one of the best squads, best training facilities by a mile, best bunch of young players coming through etc and considered a massive name for most managers at this level. He could fail here as clubs will look at the fact he's managed a club of our size as a good sign.

I did and it's worked out ok for me!

Thanks. Exactly why I don't have any hate towards him. He's basically got a free pass purely because of the way our board treated him/the state of the club off the pitch, which is mental when you consider the results.

What kind of experts were these. I've just seen something that Switzerland's women lost 7-1 to Lurzen's U15. Who is seriously going to pay huge sums in TV money, sponsorship etc for something if inferior quality. The women's world cup made something like 50 less than the men's and they're expecting that gap to be bridged in 10 years? Even 50 years is ambitious as it's pretty unlikely it will ever be completely on par with the men's team. But 10 years is just a ridiculous comment. More importantly, why must it always be compared to the men's game. It does it no good and just harm. It's already being ruined by the massive disparity in resources between the top and bottom.

And to use a more relevent example, when we played them in the championship (after he was appointed), they were super impressive. Big fan of what Rohl has done but Cifuentes is one of the very few managers ever, where I've been particularly impressed with the setup of the team/management in a game against us (often the view is that it's more about our players playing poorly, being managed poorly or just individuals in the opposition team playing better)

You're overthinking it. It's a general statement about whether the current owners need to leave. In order for the club to be sold, it needs to be put up for sale so that's kind of a given. If you vote yes to this, it does not mean that you are saying they should sell it to anyone that has an interest. That's pure supposition on your part. Would you like there to be answer that is 'yes but only to really nice and wonderful new owners please'? How could you ever quantify it at this stage. If you don't want KP to sell then it's irrelevant who the prospective buyer is. But by wanting KP to sell the club, you can still want a different profile on owner from another supporter. That doesn't invalidate your opinion that KP should sell.

That's not the question though. The question is should they sell. Not should they sell to whoever, for what ever price, under whatever circumstances. Nor is if you answer yes, you're saying you're happy for with any of the above. This is effectively should we have a vote on Brexit. The actually vote of in or out then meant we had some evidence and people canvassing for either side, which in the case of KP selling, would be the equivalent of us then saying yes or no when we have been made aware of the identity/intentions of the buyer etc.

As I said in my post, it just looks like his head is a bit scrambled in this match (I know he got 99(!) but that dismissal was so silly). He's hyper aggressive but he doesn't ever seem that reckless as he's always in control. Still, classic English fans across all sports, where you're vilified after one setback.

Brook's lost his head a bit. As aggressive as he is, he's never been completely reckless. Got away with it in the first innings but some brain dead decision making with the bat in this test.

Pelters for Stan if this falls apart

Uh oh. Still well in control but a bit more interesting now. We were properly starting to put them under the pump before the rain hit.

What's this time thing you speak of?

Agree completely but they've generally been pretty fair to fielders when the chance is tricky. Just something I've picked up on this summer where they are over the top.

Can see why Vaughan was a good captain but I agree with you. He's so up himself. Otherwise I think TMS is still decent. I actually went to a show that Aggers and Tuffers did where they just chatted cricket. Agnew actually a lot more down to earth and funny than I realised.

The quality of cricket comms/analysis is so much better than football but I've noticed this recent trend where they are ridiculously critical of the fielding. Jaiswal probably should have taken it but it was still a difficult chance, especially with the wind. Yet DK acting like he dropped a dolly. It's the 1 part of the game that is objectively much better than it was 10/20 years ago.

What I've learned is that he needs to work on his grammar/spelling and he's incredibly unprofessional if he's posting that on social media about his ex-employer

Ah fair enough. That would make more sense. Would still say he has bowled a lot less so far then he would have expected, even accounting for it being about the seamers in the early part of the season.

See my reply above. He's simply not bowling anywhere near enough overs to be the number 1 spinner. The runs are going to massively help his case for touring, especially in the sub continent.

Because 7 others bowled, one of them an opening batsman and several of them spinners. If he's not getting a bowl then, how an earth is he going to push himself into test selection as the spinner ahead of the captain's favourite? He's got so much potential as a spinner but I'm simply pointing out that despite opinions on Bashir, Rehan is doing absolutely nothing to justify him being England's no 1 spinner atm.