Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
I know we are shit and people are annoyed but forming this opinion on a short video which is likely to have been of the players warming up/cooling down is a bit wild.
Plenty of actual evidence from todays 90 mins to form that opinion.
Eh? Are we appointing someone who can have no material impact on the team? Bizarre statement.
We could have had him in on Monday and running training, I’m not talking about just throwing him in an hour before the game.
The delay might be down to Ruud. We clearly spoke to him before sacking Cooper as there were rumours of this before that happened.
That said, it’s a shame we haven’t told him we need him in place for the weekend.
Fair point, the article says the same happened to Bournemouth recently and I hadn’t heard that.
I guess the only way this becomes different is if it becomes apparent that we were complicit, which as others have said we probably wouldn’t find out.
It will (should, surely for any normal company with normal legal processes… which definitely means it won’t) have a clause for reputational based breaks.
I can’t wait for this to go to court, and for the courts to find that KP gave BC the money to then give to Leicester City. What a great decision this was.