lcfcbluearmy

I don't think it would have decreased our deficit it wouldn't gave solved it necercerally but if you have a player who has £15 million left on there book worth and you get £10 million for them rather than letting them go for free you only lose £5 million not £15 million

The period that we have been charged for is 21-23, next year's period is 22-24 etc. You don't start a whole new 3 years

We wouldn't be at the start of a new 3 year cycle that's not how it works unfortunately. The current period is 21-23 in which our financial results were 21: -31.2 m 22: -92.5 m 23: released at the end of March We have been charged with losing more than £105 million in these 3 years which means we have made less than a £ 18.7 m profit this season The next period that ends next march will include 22, 23 and 24 and one of these seasons was in the championship so we are only allowed to lose £85 million over this period rather than £105 million. Seeing as we lost 92.5 million in 22 we would need to make a profit of 7.5 m over these 2 seasons to be compliant and not be charged further in march next year Edit: the numbers I have quoted were the headline figures actual PSR accounted loss will be less due to allowable losses e.g. infrastructure and youth. However it likely won't be much different

I'm not sure we are having reread the statement I think we are disputing and are annoyed about the failing to submit accounts charge. I'm not sure we are actually disputing the PSR breach charge

Ah OK fair enough that makes sense

Except they weren't brought in until September I thought?

Although obviously if we broke the rules we deserve to be punished (even if though I believe the rules to be wrong), I have more sympathy for us/ Everton than I do forest as at least in our case it looks as of we tried to cut spending to avoid breaching FFP and that is part of what caused us to get relegated. However Forest don't look as if they even tried buying 29 players in 1 transfer window I'd ridiculous you can't play that many players you can't even have that many in your squad so I have very little sympathy for that

The best midfielder that has ever lived

I mean we could just do a man city deny everything, refuse to hand over any documents, refuse to cooperate lawyer up and push the hearing back for 5 years

Might not have been tou just seen lots of people on this forum suggesting that Chealsea are awful and we shouldn't have lost to them

There last 3 games they narrowly lost to Liverpool, drew away at Man City and beat Newcastle this isn't a bad chealsea team. They have had a poor start to the season but they are improving and still cost 1 billion pounds. Suggesting that losing away to them with 10 men is a bad result is ridiculous

Double jeopardy means as long as it wasn't violent conduct/ no attempt made to get the ball only a yellow can be given

We comfortably competed, but we weren't comfortable if that makes sense?

Good showing today showed we can comfortably compete with a billion pound premier league team. 4-2 flatters them we were on top in the second half until Doyle gets sent off. We should take confidence from that

Good showing today showed we can comfortably compete with a billion pound premier league team. 4-2 flatters them we were on top in the second half until Doyle gets sent off. We should take confidence from that

It's because he made some seriously disrespectful comments when he went to chealsea

Wtf faes

I said it's a foul but yellow not a red would have been the correct decision

There both running and he catches his heals it's a foul not a red card

Never in a million years is that a red card!

Mavividi

Take that you ****ing moaners

Fatawu didn't track back but choudhury was ball watching both at fault

Yes are you?

We aren't ****ing hell the hate some people have for their own team on this forum is embarrassing