Dahnsouff

Huth

£5 and I add a comma, £10 and it goes into two paragraphs.

Although we are unquestionably mismanaged, our deviation from our sell-an-asset-a-season approach was down to the global financial downturn and the fact our selling audience switched to selling amongst themselves as a form of protectionism.

People look at names on paper, remember them being good and therefore decide they are of a certain quality, but alas that's not remotely realistic because They deteriorate over time with age They become stale at the same club for too long They need incomings to keep them sharp Repeated failures has left us mentally weak it seems Not a 'we are where we are' post, we should be doing better, but we have some right dross amongst the players.

Was in no way celebrating him, just that we happened to win our first FA cup under his management, so there were some highlights regardless of the fallout from his tenure.

No dispute there, he arrived believing his own press and left the same. He has structurally a serious problem for LCFC's recent history.

That take from you is positively glacial.

Have a morbid curiosity as to how Russell Martin would do if Marti was given the boot.

That is ignoring our first FA cup win though, yes he is a useless self obsessed gimp, but to suggest we would have been better off not employing him is a bit tunnel vision.

They got a rebuke. Nothing progressive, so do not pretend otherwise. They are turned on because it prevents any hope of progress and not facilitate it.

You think the numbers matter? Its a distraction, one they can and have willingly used to change the direction of any dialogue. Stop acting like it doesn't matter, as those 15 idiots have allowed KP to reset the conversation,

Some people really are beyond stupid. Any hope of a serious conversation happening is now derailed by a bunch of morons too interested in looking hard in front of their knuckle dragging mates. But then again, suspect a serious conversation is the last thing such people want.

I am sure it will be on Sky Box Office

If we allow ourselves a momentary flight of fancy (not to all I realise, some are blessed with faith) then come a final reckoning, it will mean plenty, even if this is a mere footnote in this particular individuals ledger.

BBC being the bigger man/woman yet this seems both morally laudable and wrong at the same time.

Any wealth tax would need to be bulletproof (from evasion) or its pointless. And what are you actually taxing? Not earnt wealth I assume? That's just raising the tax levels. Assets? Well specifically inactive assets that just gather more wealth by existing. I am 100% for an annual tax that is levied against gains on such assets.

Quite a legacy Don will leave behind

Would rather not damage our further knacker our finances, ask Marti politely to hand in his resignation.

Guess I did not enter this chat on the ground floor.

Ah, but he has started to flirt with 3 CB systems, in which case that is not enough. This coupled with the fact that Ricky finally seems to be the declining force we have long feared, thereby offering less stability at the back, means further assurance form the bench is sensible.

It was interesting that in the post match interview, he specifically called out that cultural resets take longer. This could be protecting himself, but it is a strange thing to call out if it has no evidential reason behind it.

Yes, but with regards to Faes, we are not especially blessed with CB's, our academy seems to have few yet eligible for first team consideration, so feels like to have Faes has to be around the first XI (As the Norwich game demonstrated) Do feel like I may have missed the point you were making though!

Because he is still of enough quality to warrant a place on the bench? We don`t have many CBs of the required level?

Maybe because a deal has been struck?

There is zero evidence from the last 3 appointments this would be the case though.