Flappit

Arguably lacking a bit of match practice....

We've scored in every game... so far...

Christ, give it a rest, you're just looking foolish now.

Are you unable to comprehend the difference between a snatched goal followed by a rearguard action vs actually competing in a game? We're playing like we're a league 2 team in a cup tie valiantly defending an early goal. The win is welcome, the performance is atrocious and it shouldn't be seen as anything other than "phew, that was lucky".

Grow up. I want us to be able to compete against Bournemouth at home. Is that too ambitious?

We've been a LONG way from OK, sorry.

What utterly ridiculous substitutes to make. Cooper is an absolute moron.

Why are we treating a defensive rearguard performance with one snatched wonder goal followed by 95% defending as being a plucky performance. It's fecking Bournemouth not Manchester City were playing, ffs.

Utter rubbish. If you cannot see how we've been utterly dominated in this game, you're deluded.

We could be 4-1 down and have few complaints. The chances Bournemouth have missed, sheesh...

I find it hard to believe how Bournemouth have a better team than us. Frigging Bournemouth... And yet they are dominating possession, making us look slow and naive whenever we try and progress with the ball. It really does seem that all we have is a hope of catching them on the break.

It was down Arsenal's right wing, crossed into the box, therefore our left side defending? That's VK not JJ.

Clearly the left, no?

"whoosh" was the sound of the point, as it sailed over Clever Fox's head.

You need to stop digging... Example of your logic. Man clearly murders someone. Police fumble chain of custody or fail to follow procedure correctly. Man gets off murder charge on technicality as, effectively, part of the law cannot be enacted on that man in this specific situation. Clever fox: murder laws have been proven unenforceable, get busy everyone! (Rudkin goes to live in bunker to avoid hordes of Leicester fans)

That's not how it works, sorry.

You're not a very clever fox then... the specific loophole here doesn't apply to Everton or Forest's situation, as they remained premier league clubs. One clause being unenforceable doesn't render the entire ruleset to be the same.

Only if they'd moved their accounting period as well and ensured they transferred their share to a promoted club before the accounting period ended. It's a *really* specific edge case scenario, which many on this thread are failing to grasp with comments like "this makes the whole set of rules unenforceable" which is utter balls

I don't think that's right. They cannot apply a sanction. Well, they're welcome to, but we're not competing in their competition, so I'm happy, on behalf of Leicester, to accept a 100 point deduction for the season 2024-25. Sheff Utd were allegedly due to get hit with a points deduction on their return this year for infringements related to paying (or not!) other clubs for transfers in their promotion year.

EFL can't touch us whilst we're in the premiership. If/when we get relegated, we will be facing an almighty sanction from them IF they can prove that we broke any of their rules.

Crux, ffs!

They can't charge us. It doesn't remove the expenditure, which still contributes to the rolling 3yr total. It's not that complicated as a concept!

Fun fact of the day. There is no such thing as a tooth comb, fine or otherwise. It's a fine-toothed comb. You're welcome.

Mavididi has done more in 5 minutes than Fatawu managed all game.

Cooper stands there looking like he's managing the dog and duck.