HighPeakFox

Well done @gw_leics772. Sometimes, as I rediscover here daily, the best reaction is saying nothing in the face of provocation. Or, in the words of a chess master, the best move is often the one your opponent least wants you to make.

Ranieri going was incredibly sad, but absolutely necessary.

This doesn't count

Any gratuitous, and positive by insinuation, mention of Brexit where it is entirely irrelevant.

It is quite something, on rural Derbyshire roads, in poor light or fog, seeing the dullest of cars without lights or using pathetically inadequate sidelights, with the driver apparently oblivious to the danger they are putting themselves in.

Because it asks pertinent and unprovocative questions?

Pedantic? I thought it was calm and rational...

@Swan Lesta was confused by the question, I don't see why...

You appear to have quoted answers I never gave.

To those who want a change, fair enough - please allow me to ask you 3 questions. a) Which position do you demand LCFC finish in with the current squad of players? b) Which manager do you think offers us the best chance of achieving that? c) Is that manager even likely to take the job on in the near future?

I'm still appreciating the varying points of view here. I don't think any current contributors are the name calling problem that some of us have encountered. For my money, I'm less concerned about Puel (for the most part) and more concerned about the staffing structures and overall 'health' of the club.

Indubitably

Nah, even driverless cars will have a 'drive like an arrogant ****' setting.

A dash of salt and a bay leaf.

Indeed - but he is a past player, and his behaviour and attitude were awful.