dillonpanthers87

Again today focused on only the pitch side activities as if they have no connection to the running of the club. A number of fans I know have reached out to the station to expand the controlled post march narrative,.no reply. Our local "journalists", apart from Matt Piper are part of the problem.

I'm glad many did. I just have no connection to it at the moment, apart from a couple of players, at best. The fans and the club are miles apart.

Smoke, mirrors, tables - this isn't real madrid lads. There's an abandoned shopping trolley (two wheels) and an old milk crate (empty) down near the canal (not empty).

Bump..good listen. Cheers lads

Nah, they'll keep it short. 3 year incentive based for the 4th year.

I'd take this as long as the scumbags that own us move on too.

Link pls? Also, JJ (the most Leicester player we've had signed in a while, he's so refreshing), and Skipp tbf. Otherwise, a paper the cracks kind of game

LCFC X Hippo collab. I'll get KP out ones obvs, but I just love the idea of Rudkin going for a piss somewhere, looking up and having this massive beautiful b*stard staring him down.

Plenty of opportunities. It's just stickers so wouldn't change the world obviously but at least would be growing visibility to the level of growth of anti KP in the fanbase for those who don't come on here etc. Is always nice when you come across a UFS one out and about or general city stickers in random places at home and overseas, may as well add a few anti KP to the mix

Anyone know where these can be bought? Or maybe some crowdfunding idea to bulk order?

Pipes is great. It's the station who should do better. Are the public the customer of the station, or the club?

Well said

Properly insightful cheers. Didn't realise there was a 'closed shop ' Whatsapp group but makes sense with the same names coming up each week

I'll be honest, I'm in disbelief at some of the people you have on. Each to their own. I won't, and I'm sure many won't listen based on that. Sitting on the fence for max views. 👍

Then a good broadcaster or journalist finds a way round it. The club only has so many routes to reach the fans.

Worth it for what? There's only so much the access can be reduced, and at some point it hurts the club more than the local media. It's public radio,.not sky sports.

The fact it seemingly wasn't even acknowledged is poor. But hey let's sit on a pod /radio week after week talking about why we don't have a better squad.

Exactly this.

The annual "we asked for an interview with Rudkin/Whelan" etc is often touted. Is the response to that "ah well, we tried"? And if there is more to the relationship in the club, requiring certain editorial content etc, then publish that. It's like the fan committee meetings - the fact the actual minutes etc don't get published speaks more than what the actual content could say. I'd love for RL to actually address some of this stuff. What do they want their role here to be? Because it's beyond on the pitch performance right now.

Today (on top of other weeks) is what did it for me today. Totally appreciate they have a balance to make, or guidelines to operate under, but a good broadcaster or journalist will find moments, or be able to navigate these relationships. I view it in a similar way to staff in the club, the fanbase etc. - it's easy to coast when things are going well, and by all means we should enjoy that, but when things start to impact the club we care about, anyone with an interest or passion in the club should try and dig us out the hole. Local media is a huge part of the following, like it or not. I wonder if it has a part in why some of our fanbase is so passive. That's likely unfair. I'm frustrated all round. But I stand by what I said and our local media needs to provide better representation to not only support our local lcfc community, but to compete with other outlets.

Why do you continually seem to skirt over the fundamental issues within the club, specifically King Power, sponsorship, club treatment of fans, now club treatment of their own staff and delayed payment? I know there are several answers to this, access and relationship etc. But, this is a unique position we are in as a club. The future of Leicester City is currently deeply entwined with a failing business, who is putting the future of our club at a significant risk through year on year mismanagement in every sense, ran by a nepo-baby, absent owner (albeit from his scripted, propaganda style "wanting to be closer to the fans" while in a Bangkok corporate HQ wearing a suit interview, which RL lapped up) We all know the playing side and manager are atrocious, specifically the players who for 98% of them, are deluded, lazy, self centered clowns, but the easy ride given to King Power, Aiyawat, Rudkin) is not representative of supporters opinion (apart from the sheep who still applaud them off after relegation, abysmal performances, while the likes of Harry Winks, Faes, others, pick up 40-90k a week) You ask the same questions of the manager every single week. There is no real drive behind any questions, it's a checkbox exercise. No wonder managers like Cifuentes and RVN can get by with platitudes and monotonous manager-speak every week. Where are the difficult questions? Do you wonder why podcasts like BSLB have such a connection with the fans? Because they often speak for the majority of fans (although I should add they have never intended or suggested this was the case - I say this with my own opinion) The radio station was rightly strong enough to call out Brendan Rodgers when he started attacking the club (mostly Matty P), but you seem to barely register the fact staff have not got paid as agreed. This is more-so on the club as it is the station - but the fact the station has failed to get an interview with anyone at the club in a leadership position has to be considered evidence as a lack of the club feeling accountable with the local media. Urge you to take a more direct and journalistic approach especially given the foxes trust board elections coming up.

And apparently he's for youth, but his main way of giving them a chance is throwing them on at 70 mins in a toxic atmosphere and hoping they can do something. He's thick.

Scum ownership, led by scummy human beings, evidenced by the clubs behaviour with staff payment, sponsorships, obviously the list goes on. They are not Leicester City, they are failures who we need to get rid of like a virus as soon as possible.

"The club will explain more in detail when it’s time to do it about what will be the role of the technical director." Is this a pointed comment I wonder

Bslb mention online sources. I can't find anything though