CornwallFox

They literally list harder to collaborate with humans as a negative. AI does this whenever it's left to 'talk' to other AI as it makes zero sense to speak in English when they can create shorthand languages they understand that get the job done far more efficiently. I'm not saying there's no reason to oversee AI, I'm simply saying that what was shown just looks like a scare story when in reality this is exactly what you want AI to do.

They're not creating languages to obfuscate humans. They use non human languages because they aren't human and it's quicker. They're programmed to do just that.

What's the concern exactly? Don't we want AI fixing problems? If you don't view it through the lens of the terminator's skynet, it's bots noting problems which other bots could fix it they were linked.

The worth of it is how much stuff you can buy with it. There would still be a finite amount of stuff and so prices would still be dictated by liquidity. No different to now. Right now it makes no difference where your money came from it still has a value relative to what you can buy with it.

Just a difference of opinion my friend. I get where you're coming from, he's a senior professional now, but I just don't think he helps us win football matches. Good at recovering the call maybe but then unable to use it, even with simple passes. Think I'd rather change the system.

There is no world in which I will ever put Hamza in a line up I'm hoping for.

The value of money comes from what you can buy with it, not what it took to get.

The 'predictions' you've read about haven't come from scientists. They've come from the media spinning the most extreme extrapolations of any theory they've spotted to sell papers. They haven't been serious studies that have produced those scare stories. Real science is slow, calculated, tested, and sober. It produces models that utilise a huge array of variants and predict outcomes based on varying inputs. What we are seeing through real world observation is that even the worst realistic outcomes shown via climate models are underplaying what is observed - climate change in the real world is happening even faster than 'predicted'. While it's quite easy to question that sitting in the temperate UK or swathes of temperate US, there are countless stories of hugely unusual weather patterns and outcomes across the globe - in Pakistan an area bigger than the whole UK under water, in China two months above 40°. When the UK hit 40° two or three years ago that single thing wasn't expected for another 50 years. The reality is that the same scientists that have produced studies showing the long term changes to temperature and environment - so often cited by climate change deniars - are the same ones that have been equally careful on concluding that human caused climate change is a real and existential threat that is already with us. Genuinely, within 15 years I don't think anybody will question this stuff any more.

Thought experiment: AI and robotics remove the need for humanity to do any work. Everything we need grown or built by robots and overseen by AI. Instead, we give people money and they have all the free time they want to use that money to do what interests them. Pros and cons?

Feel like there's gotta be a few hundred Spanish pesetas lying around at my parents' house somewhere.

Fantastic news!

The better the quality the stronger and longer lasting the smell. A good perfum will last a long time as opposed to a eau de toilette which is a much lower concentration. Anyway, favourite smelly is Spice Bomb Extreme by Viktor and Rolf.

Cheers @kenny, appreciate your responses.

No idea why but my response has led to this - note to moderator, I'd be grateful if you could let this post as I really don't understand what the issue is. I've had post limits and now this despite filling my question with caveats to now read it as an attack. It's really bizarre.

I'm going to cut them some slack for RvN as that looked an exciting appointment at the time. Could easily have gone differently and in hindsight how much did the players cause that season rather than the managers?

Can I ask a genuine question? This is going to come across potentially as an attack but I'm trying to work out whether there's any truth in what I sometimes think, from somebody in the industry. So I'd be grateful if you look beyond what you might perceive as a bit attacking your profession as I'm genuinely interested in your thoughts. It's just, I see guys doing basic building jobs earning amounts most graduates will never achieve. I see building companies sitting on swathes of land and only building an amount that allows prices to remain high. I see a wish to maximise profits on every home - which is how the private sector works in all industries so that isn't novel. I see charges for upkeep in the form of ground rent. I see really, really poorly built new builds across the country. So my question, bearing in mind I've said all the above without any real knowledge of the industry so I'm willing to listen if I'm wrong - is any of the above good for the country? Given we need more housing built, should we trust private sector building firms to actually build quality housing at a fair price?

What's worse is it actually would

Please be true. I often cite Daka as the worst city player of all time. Soumare has to be the laziest.

What's that got to do with whether they're friendly? When did China last threaten, invade or otherwise force itself upon another nation? Yes people will point at Taiwan but I think that's a more complex picture if you're Chinese. China appears to want to grow and be world leading but without necessarily crushing everybody else. It appears to think a multipolar world is fine. The US takes a very different approach and China only gets talked about as a mortal enemy because America always talks in terms of good and evil, painting itself as a benevolent leader of the world. It absolutely doesn't want a multi polar world. Pushing away from the EU looks more and more stupid with every day that passes.

I seem to be limited to x number of posts a day but I've no idea how many or why. Anybody able to help? If I was posting something wrong I would think you'd want me posting zero posts, and somebody could just tell me if I need to moderate something. No idea what's going on 🤷

Let them, they're doing a terrible job everywhere else they've got councils

I'm unconvinced. We have mostly terrible players, paid a ridiculous amount so we can't sell and can't afford to buy. They don't give a toss, half of them want out, it was a terrible hand. He didn't do a very good job though.

Difference being city hardly ever get it in any more either

At some point you just have to take the economic hit and entirely close your border with the US and instead import from the EU and China.

Think I would see it as either to the end of the season, or all of next season of we don't sack this season. We clearly have no money. There's going to be a big transition as well let big earners leave and once enough go presumably at that point might be able to bring in lesser quality on realistic wages. Somebody that isn't aiming for the top is necessary and an older manager who's been there done it in the championship could be the way to go to get us through this period. Once we've got rid of everybody and are back to championship wages and income we can look to start again when somebody that wants to build a team and try to get up and build something new.