Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

HankMarvin

Member
  • Posts

    16,495
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by HankMarvin

  1. The club didn’t want to sell, sure seems like it for a player in contract for a good few years Palace must of been offering even less
  2. So according to Rob, in 5 days the fee to “prise him away” dropped by £9m
  3. I wonder if he left it as late as possible in the hope the club might come calling. Seems odd to leave it this late, clearly if it was his choice to leave he would’ve had options ready to go soon after leaving.
  4. He only has a year left, and has started every game so the manager considers him an asset and if we don’t plan on bringing anyone else in then surely it’s better to keep the strongest 11, If PSR as reported is not a concern any more.
  5. On one hand Dorset saying we don’t need to sell any more players after Justin to appease PSR on the other hand players being offered to clubs after starting well 🤔
  6. Dorset clearly another still out of the loop. £35m to prise him away now being reported as £26m agreed
  7. No I’m asking you who publicly stated we do not need to sell? He is isn’t going to be sold, if it doesn’t benefit the club. so it’s not quite as simplistic as saying he would’ve been sold already. That would depend on what’s been offered
  8. Publicly stated by anyone with any credibility?
  9. I guess it all depends how bad the finances are
  10. Last time we were in the championship our wages including staff were £107m the average first team wage in the championship annually is £14m
  11. KDH was sold on the 23/24 accounts
  12. And how much was spent bloating the squad last year that people seem to ignore, that are additional costs on 23/24
  13. The rest works out less than KDH last time
  14. We haven’t actually made £50m as such, it’s only the profit between what’s left on the books and the profit once you factor in some of the deals had add ons etc it’s not as much as it seems. I guess by the close of the window we will now how bad the situation is if there are 0 arrivals
  15. Wages cost money though, unless there are clubs that will subsidise wages and that seems to defeat the reason why the majority of clubs want the players off the wage bill to go on loan in the first place. Plus any decent young player at a top club probably on at least a few million a year
  16. He has pumped in a lot of money to offset debt aside from net spend
  17. Yeah the young kid is being thrown in the deep end and gets an assist. Lets critique every aspect of his game like he is a seasoned pro. Look how much older Barnes and KDH were when they got loans to league one teams
  18. We do if it means breaching PSR and points deductions for potentially another season, there is a reason one free signing all summer
  19. But it wouldn’t be of a benefit financially and no one knows quite how bad our situation is yet
  20. In what world, would having an unhappy player injured unable to leave be a benefit to a club that doesn’t have a pot to piss in to make transfers. Sell a valued asset instead like Fatawu?
  21. Nothing to do with the club not wanting to risk injury to offload unhappy players?
  22. “Leicester City’s commitment to long-term growth is beginning to bear fruit“ spun like it was a choice
  23. Clean the bike sheds smiggy
×
×
  • Create New...