MPH

he was a s wheat player when he played for us though

They'd be able to pay for this persons wages twice over if they'd just fill the empty seats with fans wanting to pay for those empty seats...

I hope we do!

Its a bit of a stretch to say its been criminally untested although essentially true. 'its criminally untested' because it has been considered previously to be against the law to prosecute a president for anything done in office. Thats why there have been no previous prosecutions. Its only this modern day democratic party who are looking into this and excuse my nonchalance about their chances, but I believe this Democratic party will stop at nothing to try and stop Trump from being president again.. But again, as mentioned previously, do not take this as me supporting trump. I have never and will never vote for him. I think i mentioned in my post about how they will interpret the law- as per usual Democrats and Republicans will interpret the law differently. and as per usual in American politics, It will go along party lines. Also in the virginia law article it does say this: Can a president be prosecuted while in office? It remains official Justice Department policy that presidents can't be prosecuted and therefore no U.S. attorney will ever indict or prosecute a sitting president. Although i accept that doesn't mean, according to that statement, it would be illegal to do so.

interestingly American law forbids a president from being prosecuted for any offense committed while in office. He hasn’t and neither will he be prosecuted for insurrection. A democratic leaning state court will interpret that law as saying he is no longer in office so will penalize him due to their interpretation of the law. The Republican Supreme Court will rule that any offense happened whilst he was still a ruling president and therefore there can be no penalty or punishment from it, regardless of whether he committed insurrection. And whilst you mention the separation of powers, it is worth noting that this is a federal presidential election and not a state election so no court system in Colorado has any legal right to remove his name from a federal ballot paper. Its basically nothing more than a symbolic gesture as the Supreme Court will vote it Down.

Then by all means, charge a quid for membership

well, it would suit us to get a new striker in who wants to be here doesn't look so disinterested when he plays.. whos a bit more mobile and has some pace...

Lovely jubbly!

Nailed on loan deal.

what amuses me about all that is that so many sectors of society make up that vote- left leaning under 30 Americans- homosexual, lesbian , transgenders… and yet these are all people who would be outright killed by Hamas without the bat of an eyelid… and that left leaning America seems to be the last part of the political spectrum to condemn the October 7th attacks due to the oppression of the Palestinian people. Now don’t get me wrong , I sympathize with that particular concern greatly, that but that can never be a justification for the rape and murder of women and children. Neither side can justify that. Period.

You just can’t deny him the chance to go to Villa really. They won’t win it, but I’m sure he would enjoy being in and around the top 6..

I can’t stand trump and I would never vote for him but yeah, this may end up being a massive faux pas.. the amusing thing about it all is that he lost convincingly in Colorado- a very liberal state and had no hope of winning it in 24 so I’m not sure what they were hoping to achieve… also legally, I dont think they have a leg to stand on… what is a state doing trying to affect a federal election?

I blocked the Muppet on twitter but someone please post this on his timeline... Edit, @urban.spaceman i don't mean you, you are not a muppet.

Quite interested in the Dubois fight to be honest... Risky move, but if it pays off, , it could be massive for him..

There's definitely a boxing day curse for me these days. Ever since i moved to the united states, its usually straight back to work for me. They don't celebrate Boxing day over here. Everything, including banks are back open on the 26th!

haha, i'm just slow today, that's all. or should I say ' even slower''

fair points!

I'm not as disappointed as i thought i would be with the idea of Nacho leaving. There was a time I'd have wanted us to do anything to convince him to stay. There's been too many times this season however that he's appeared disinterested and unmotivated. This is a discussion board so we can share our thoughts, etc., so i wonder if he's been promised a January move or if his head has been turned? or if he just flat out doesn't want to be here. Hes a good player and gets goals/assists... he just.. seems to be unhappy often.

this is definitely a consideration as to why we would need another striker, imo. It would be a risk not to, I think.

my only concern would be if Daka gets injured. Law of averages is that one of the remaining 3 strikers we have should Nacho leave will probably have an injury that keeps them out for 2-3 weeks minimum between now and the end of the season. Has Vardy got it in him to do the full 90 for a 3-4 game stretch? Cannon seems to only be trusted to get 10-15 minutes max at the moment, let alone starting a couple of games.

Agree completely. The only reason why not. i think, is that i feel we would need a replacement. Do we want to spend money to get one in? is it cheaper to let him run down his contract than it would be to pay a transfer fee needed to secure a 4-5 year deal? would we be able to get a quality loan in who could be a starter if needed?

The midnight game from Dagestan, probably…

European Super League: New proposal launched for European competition https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/67787981