Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Jimmy

Member
  • Posts

    13,368
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by Jimmy

  1. weird I'm sure the bbc website said West Ham earlier in any case Missy Goodwin has scored we're now 4-0 up
  2. Man City are playing West Ham
  3. he needed to show some leadership Monday night and grab hold of Faes and stop him being so far up field he was leaving gaping holes that kept causing us issues
  4. I wonder if any u21 midfielders have been promoted given our depth issues currently
  5. Not true you can still give them an 8 year deal if you like but the amortization is limited to 5 years maximum
  6. Replacement for a player we had no interest in playing isn't hard to find
  7. its not just about amortisation of fees getting Praet's wages gone may have been the bigger benefit long term I'd need to look at what we were supposedly offered back then I know Torino weren't exactly being generous at the time either. No doubt there are other examples over recent years too
  8. Palace bid £4m for Iversen in the summer we rejected it as we were demanding £6m, why? it left us stuck with a player that was never going to play depreciating in value for 4 months paying his wages and now all we could do was find a loan for him, how much did we have to pay him during that time, how much of his wages are we paying during his loan? Was it really worth it over £2m? I like that we play hardball over our stars but for players like this if the offer is reasonable take it.. How many offers for Praet have we rejected for a player we didn't want on a lot of money that we will lose for free this summer? Its just bad squad management and this all falls within Rudkin's remit, that's why people look at him
  9. it would have been for serious foul play though not violent conduct
  10. law of averages, how often when teams go ultra defensive does it actually work? he knows we can be lethal on the counter so 2 fast wingers with Cannon may have been all we needed to keep that attacking threat and lessen the defensive load
  11. Palmer wouldn't have been sent off by VAR it doesn't get involved with second yellows we would have had a penalty but their CB would have been sent off VAR might have downgraded Fatawu's tackle but not sure
  12. its called a forum, people discuss things and give their opinions, after nearly 5k posts I would have thought you'd know how they worked by now ...
  13. Mavididi should have stayed on with McAteer replacing Casadei 441, then if Cannon was out of gas Sharky on with one of the wingers going up top, he'll have learned a lot today
  14. haven't you heard, its scenes of the future Vardy movie, his last act in football is scoring the goal that seals the league win and lifting the trophy as captain
  15. I like the look of Kasey Palmer, I think both him and O'Hare are out of contract in the summer so could be available cheap if Rudkin ever manages to sell someone
  16. thought the commentators said both had been booked, they both hacked at him. EDIT: commentators were wrong, just checked Hamza wasn't booked at all
  17. he was, he got booked for bringing the Japanese winger down then brought the full back down in a similar way
  18. if you want to go down that line Hamza should have gone for a second yellow too so I'm inclined to be more generous over a potential second yellow
  19. the one from our goal gives the clearest view I've seen on first viewing live I thought clear red so I'm not angry the ref did like others seem to be, his only clear error was their defender staying on for the penalty
  20. the reverse angle casts doubt on that for me, he's always along the ground and its foot to foot, given a studs up knee high tackle wasn't deemed a red I think we'll chance our arm with an appeal
  21. bad day for Enzo, learn from it and move on
  22. Abdul's form has just dipped so a few games off might not be the worst thing for him that said I wonder if we'll appeal
  23. no but it upgrades Thomas to a red so its 10 a side
  24. Enzo has hardly used his bench of late he used to use all 5 now he barely makes 3 subs, maybe that was down to lack of options but we had them today
  25. Enzo has been superb but he made a big mistake surrendering any attacking intent, I cannot remember the last time we played so defensively and it worked, going back years, we needed to keep a threat on the counter, Hamza coming on at wing back was odd too given we had Riccy in the back 3, 3 cbs on the bench and Sharky would have seemed a more obvious choice. That said it should have been 10 a side and we wouldn't have had to go ultra defensive
×
×
  • Create New...