Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Dan

Member
  • Posts

    44,108
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    41

Everything posted by Dan

  1. Faes as well. All of them ranging from £8mil-£15mil. It's absolutely rank stuff.
  2. If these things were true, the manner of last season simply doesn't happen.
  3. That's a super signing. They will walk it I think.
  4. It's probably more linked to him being largely shite for us I would imagine.
  5. Read that as wasserman
  6. I reckon Wes Morgan would've had a fair few critics when we signed him.
  7. One down, about twelve to go. An absolutely awful signing on the whole. Massive trap fallen into by our board who fell for the intangibles and missed the obvious red flags.
  8. Marc Cucurella. Everyone hates him but he's a very good full back.
  9. Harry Kane is actually pretty inoffensive, he's just disliked through circumstances. He seems a genuinely sound bloke.
  10. He was MOTM in the final as well, completely pocketed Mahrez. He's definitely gone a bit the way of Luke Shaw though, just a bit of a nothing player these days.
  11. The 2022/23 squad to be honest but that is precisely why I ended up disliking them - it's without doubt in my eyes the strongest squad to ever be relegated from the Premier League. Maddison is the very obvious example. He grates on me but he's obviously a pretty good player.
  12. This is a move that genuinely sorts all parties. Big earner off the books, obviously good fit for the podcaster to join Disney, but on the pitch as well actually not a bad move for them really.
  13. which pub was it about 12 years ago when we played them away where our fans just went completely berserk and trashed the place, was very civilised for a while and then out of nowhere everyone seemed to go mental. Remember seeing a hand dryer being thrown around it
  14. I'll believe it when I see it.
  15. This just has too many red flags for me. I'm convinced it's one of those we'd look at in a year and think it was a good move and look at in two years and think it was madness. We aren't going to get him on a reasonable deal, that seems to be precisely why he's left Burnley.
  16. No matter how bad we are I just can't see playing Derby as anything other than 6 points. We've had their number for ages. Them and Coventry have still never won at our current ground.
  17. Can I bet against some of you who think we'll lose to Wednesday. I'm as cynical as anyone and even I think we'll hammer them. It's like nothing I've ever seen - it's a step up from even that Hull game.
  18. Literally 0. I wouldn't give a single shit if the Wednesday game didn't go ahead. But that is partly driven by my own circumstance of being banned for nothing. I'd have some buzz if I was able to actually go although I don't think it would be very high. But yeah the club banning me for literally nothing puts it at bang on 0 for me.
  19. Just absolute lunacy if that's true. For that sort of money they should be at worst midtable PL players. It's just insane we sign this sort of stuff off.
  20. There are players I've more of an axe to grind with than Justin despite how poor he was last season, always felt he was a bit unlucky with injuries and got misused last season. He's probably had more bad games for us than good after such a promising opening couple of years and I want a big overhaul so for that reason - SELL!
  21. If he's left Burnley it will be because his demands are a bit silly. We will go and hand him something like £60k a week over four years.
  22. If we were having a drastic squad overhaul I would back the signing. You've worded it better than me - it's the pattern of behaviour rather than the player itself. I did think similarly with Coady and Winks at the time. Coady more so because he had just been shunned by basically the 16th and 17th best PL teams which was a big red flag. Winks in fairness I saw a bit more logic and you could have argued it was a real coup. I'm amazed at quite how badly Winks has dipped. He finished badly in 2023/24 and he was an absolute shambles last season. Brownhill definitely aids our team and for that reason it's hard to argue against the signing but it's not really that black and white for me anymore. I'd have backed it more two years ago than I do now.
  23. Before I say all of this I'll caveat by saying he's clearly pretty good and plugs what is a big gap in our team currently in that virtually none of the midfielders ever score. Winks, Skipp, Ndidi and Soumare have a combined 20 career goals. Brownhill got 18 last season alone and was a big part in Burnley's promotion. But I am scared. It's all very short-term thinking again. The Winks and Coady signings to me were both failures in the end - we paid a Premier League level fee and gave them both Premier League level contracts. Both of them therefore should be held to a standard of being above the Championship and both of them totally flunked it last season for us. Brownhill I fear is very similar. 29 years old and never really made much of an impact at PL level. He would be leaving a club who have just gone up to the Premier League and coming here - the only reason would be similar to why Coady came here instead of to Luton, Sheffield United etc.. - we would be paying over the odds. I can see it happening and I can see him being good for us in the Championship, but beyond that is my fear. If we were to pay him a PL level contract, we should be demanding a PL level output and nobody can seriously argue against this.
  24. I'm very torn on Josh Brownhill. He plugs the gap I think is a major issue in the squad in terms of midfield goals but it's another player who is approaching 30, who hasn't ever really made an impact at Premier League level that we could only attract here by offering a Premier League contract - why else would Burnley have let him go? It would be a decent short-term move but that is also the problem in itself, it has potential to preserve the problems we have.
  25. They'll still be older than a lot of our team (hopefully!)
×
×
  • Create New...