fuchsntf Posted 14 July 2016 Posted 14 July 2016 I just cant get over the audacity of him sending Vardy off, for a dive he could never honestly interpret, plus some of the pundits, and media alike. The man ( maybe also the FA) had an agenda that day. I will protect support refs, for getting some descisions wrong, or just having a ' bad days at the office' but this descision..was cheating, I suppose trying to make a mark. He had no right to call it, nobody is that clever...
Gforce19 Posted 14 July 2016 Posted 14 July 2016 That's it , what's the route, nails and broken glass may suddenly appear !!
sm1 Posted 14 July 2016 Posted 14 July 2016 I just cant get over the audacity of him sending Vardy off, for a dive he could never honestly interpret, plus some of the pundits, and media alike. The man ( maybe also the FA) had an agenda that day. I will protect support refs, for getting some descisions wrong, or just having a ' bad days at the office' but this descision..was cheating, I suppose trying to make a mark. He had no right to call it, nobody is that clever... Exactly, I'm indifferent to referees. Over the course of a season you'll have some decisions go for you and some that won't, but Moss came into that game with an agenda. The Vardy sending off, when there was blatant contact. The West Ham penalty, before which he singled out Huth and Morgan, when West Ham players were pushing and shoving as much as anybody. The denying of a City penalty when Huth was put in a headlock right in front of him. These weren't honest mistakes they were the actions of a fat cheating cvnt. I'm afraid time won't change how I feel about him.
DB11 Posted 15 July 2016 Author Posted 15 July 2016 He was bad. Ultimately who gives a shit. Wasn't the first ref to have a mare reffing Leicester city will most certainly not be the last. I'd of thought you of all people would get that. Doubt there's never been a game where you've walked away thinking I've had a bit of a shocker there. Well yeah I do, that's why the comment "who cares cos we won" really pisses me off. Why should the result affect your opinion on if the referee was good or not? It shouldn't and so they're the sort of people who I think fvck off you don't know what you're talking about when, if their team loses, they don't shut up about the referee. Can't have best of both
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.