Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Mark

Match Ratings: Middlesbrough 1-0 Leicester City - Vote Now

Middlesbrough 1-0 Leicester City

You do not have permission to vote. Please login to vote.
  1. 5.5

    Total Average Rating

    86 votes
  2. Highest Rated Player

    Mads Hermansen 6.8
  3. Lowest Rated Player

    Kelechi Iheanacho 3.8
  4. Manager Confidence 93% -1%

Recommended Posts

Posted

Season: 2023/24
Voting Starts: 11/11/23
Voting Ends: 16/11/23

  1. Mads Hermansen
  2. Hamza Choudhury
  3. Wout Faes
  4. Jannik Vestergaard
  5. James Justin
  6. Harry Winks
  7. Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall
  8. Ricardo Pereira
  9. Kasey McAteer
  10. Kelechi Iheanacho
  11. Stephy Mavididi
  12. Abdul Fatawu (sub)
  13. Jamie Vardy (sub)

Posted

Big Mads fantastic, 8, Faes 7 was strong and dominant, KDH 7, was an engine in midfield, winning the ball back and trying to make things happen.

Vestergaard’s worst performance of the season, gave the ball away too often and the stupid and unnecessary  back heel for their goal summed up his performance. 4

Mavididi was dreadful 3 could be generous.

Iheanacho 1 shocking, not interested and broke down almost every attack we had. Absolute stinker 

  • Haha 1
Posted
38 minutes ago, Spiritwalker said:

Thought Faes was our best outfield player. Kelechi should have been hooked at halftime.

One again Enzo didn't react quick enough to a player having a stinker as per Casadei against Leeds!!!

  • Like 2
Posted

Dewsbury-Hall had a great game, McAteer not at the races today, poor back heel by Vestergaard, which led to the free kick, which they scored, Iheanacho should have been replace, three strikers on the bench.

Posted

Ironically, Iheanacho (apart from Vestergaard’s header) had our two best chances- only to be denied by a reflex save by their GK and the post. Perhaps that’s why Enzo left him in. He (sometimes) can have a subpar performance and still find his way to the back of the net (or thereabouts).

 

Meanwhile, the amount of times he dropped way deep (even to virtually the edge of our eighteen yard box) to pick up possession and try to bring others into play has to be purposefully by design. Otherwise, Enzo would have chewed his ear off - and most likely yanked him off.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, NaijaFox said:

Ironically, Iheanacho (apart from Vestergaard’s header) had our two best chances- only to be denied by a reflex save by their GK and the post. Perhaps that’s why Enzo left him in. He (sometimes) can have a subpar performance and still find his way to the back of the net (or thereabouts).

 

Meanwhile, the amount of times he dropped way deep (even to virtually the edge of our eighteen yard box) to pick up possession and try to bring others into play has to be purposefully by design. Otherwise, Enzo would have chewed his ear off - and most likely yanked him off.

Ooooooo, you are awful!!.

....but I like you.

  • Haha 1
Posted

Inheacho and Mavididi were awful.

Hermansen was good and a brilliant save to keep us in the game at HT.

Faes probably our best outfield player.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...