Chrysalis Posted 26 January 2006 Posted 26 January 2006 saints he barely had few games. Mind you I read the rest now and I would like gibson I think he would be like pearce his heart in it and see like the fans, he was far from impressed with us on the last game which shows he expects higher standards then levein.
Louise Posted 26 January 2006 Author Posted 26 January 2006 saints he barely had few games. Mind you I read the rest now and I would like gibson I think he would be like pearce his heart in it and see like the fans, he was far from impressed with us on the last game which shows he expects higher standards then levein. Why do you think Levein was happy with our last game?
Babylon Posted 26 January 2006 Posted 26 January 2006 Why do you think Levein was happy with our last game? Of course, he was the Devil incarnate remember. I believe he sacrificed lambs at an altar in his back garden every night.
Louise Posted 26 January 2006 Author Posted 26 January 2006 Of course, he was the Devil incarnate remember. I believe he sacrificed lambs at an altar in his back garden every night. It heard it was babies.
wonderboy Posted 26 January 2006 Posted 26 January 2006 It heard it was babies. should have been kisnorbo
Chimp Posted 26 January 2006 Posted 26 January 2006 It heard it was babies. No, it was the hopes and dreams of the fans...
Anish Posted 26 January 2006 Posted 26 January 2006 Why do you think Levein was happy with our last game? Because he didn't sound too upset or disappointed in the team after his SIXTH straight defeat. "It was another game we lost to a wondergoal, we will keep working hard in training, and things will change for us" isn't the words of a manager who is frustrated and angry.
davieG Posted 26 January 2006 Posted 26 January 2006 Because he didn't sound too upset or disappointed in the team after his SIXTH straight defeat. "It was another game we lost to a wondergoal, we will keep working hard in training, and things will change for us" isn't the words of a manager who is frustrated and angry. Of course just because he doesn't lose his rag in public means he behaves like that in private, the simple fact is we don't know what went on in the dressing room, maybe all these rumours about bust ups with Maybury, Hume, Dublin were in fact him being bloody angry.
Bloomer Posted 26 January 2006 Posted 26 January 2006 Of course just because he doesn't lose his rag in public means he behaves like that in private, the simple fact is we don't know what went on in the dressing room, maybe all these rumours about bust ups with Maybury, Hume, Dublin were in fact him being bloody angry. he lost his temper quite savagely in public onone occasion didnt he, when he whacked Graham Hogg for lack of effort in a game. Might be that he said never again.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.