The People's Hero Posted 7 March 2006 Posted 7 March 2006 Yes they can its their money. They write the terms and conditions of the loan. If the financial situation of the borrower worsens then they may feel their lent amount is at risk and withdraw the facility. Hence why they would have reviews of their borrowers financies on a regular basis to ensure they get their money back. If the finances are in the shit then the club will have to sell to address the balance. They write them and they have to adhere to them. So I don't really see what your point is?
Strokes Posted 7 March 2006 Posted 7 March 2006 Im sorry but i think its a bit rich coming from you !! having ago at people for not wanting the tigers or the birch to go, when you gave me such a hard time about smoking at the walkers, you were quite prepared to loose season ticket sales over that issue!!!!! Hows the smoking thing going?? you said you would attempt to give up, i am now 10 days without a ciggy which i am rather chuffed about.
trueblue1 Posted 7 March 2006 Posted 7 March 2006 Hows the smoking thing going?? you said you would attempt to give up, i am now 10 days without a ciggy which i am rather chuffed about. hello mate, havent tried yet, but will be shortly, Ispoke with Peter Jones about this matter and he said that nothing had been decided yet, and a meeting would take place soon.
Strokes Posted 7 March 2006 Posted 7 March 2006 hello mate, havent tried yet, but will be shortly, Ispoke with Peter Jones about this matter and he said that nothing had been decided yet, and a meeting would take place soon. Yeah i got the same sort of impression in an email i sent to Peter, TBH i am not giving up for that reason specifically, it's also in a bid to save some money for Germany in the summer. Good luck if and when you do start chief.
trueblue1 Posted 7 March 2006 Posted 7 March 2006 Yeah i got the same sort of impression in an email i sent to Peter, TBH i am not giving up for that reason specifically, it's also in a bid to save some money for Germany in the summer. Good luck if and when you do start chief. I sent an email to him aswell, but he phoned me instead of replying by email, it was good of him, thanks for your support for when i give up!! im just waiting for the right moment to start. But it will be done!!! !!
Strokes Posted 7 March 2006 Posted 7 March 2006 I sent an email to him aswell, but he phoned me instead of replying by email, it was good of him, thanks for your support for when i give up!! im just waiting for the right moment to start. But it will be done!!! !! Not tomorrow its National non-smoking day, so for love of god please do not do it when Blair tells you too.
trueblue1 Posted 7 March 2006 Posted 7 March 2006 Not tomorrow its National non-smoking day, so for love of god please do not do it when Blair tells you too. NO CHANCE !!!!! lol
Strokes Posted 7 March 2006 Posted 7 March 2006 I'm gonna start tomorrow!! Ha, believe me, if i thought i was strong enough to give up again, i would smoke for the whole of tomorrow.
TrickyTrev Posted 7 March 2006 Posted 7 March 2006 I think you'll find when we get a few more points on the board we'll see Sylla and Williams get a nice run in the first team in order to put them in the shop window. Tiatto and De Vries are both near certainties to go which will hopefully reduce the wage bill somewhat.
Knighton Matt Posted 7 March 2006 Posted 7 March 2006 Just to clarify bank overdrafts can be withdrawn by the bank immediately regardless of whether the lendee breaches any terms and conditions or not. Banks aren't stupid if they think a business is going down the pan and there's no assets to sell off to repay their loan they don't just sit around praying for the business to breach the terms and conditions they withdraw the facility immediately. Nothing to do with being unprofessional it's the most common sense business policy I could think of?! Unfortunately (and sorry to get all accountancy on ur ass) there's some pretty mental accounting standards coming into play which are going to make LCFC's accounts look even worse. Given that we don't own our stadium outright these are still worrying times. Makes you wonder why on earth they gave Levein £300k for Hammond when we already had him on loan til Xmas and they knew full well that gates were down on what had been forecast which would swallow up the £1m from Wigan. I'm not entirely impressed by the spend now pay later attitude of our board! One day it's going to get us into a hell of a lot of trouble.
The People's Hero Posted 7 March 2006 Posted 7 March 2006 £300k for Hammond is bad business whichever way you look at it.
Anish Posted 7 March 2006 Posted 7 March 2006 £300k for Hammond is bad business whichever way you look at it. Not if you're selling him for £300k, I bet Fulham were well chuffed
The People's Hero Posted 7 March 2006 Posted 7 March 2006 Proof that bungs are rife in football, if you ask me. Either that or his agent is a genius.
TheHonourableOne Posted 7 March 2006 Posted 7 March 2006 I can see Stearman and Gareth Williams being sold to generate revenue!!! Well one of those players has already agreed a transfer.
The People's Hero Posted 7 March 2006 Posted 7 March 2006 Well one of those players has already agreed a transfer. Where is Willyums off to then?
newms Posted 7 March 2006 Posted 7 March 2006 the clubs also done some very good business imho, such as Connolly £3.5million to Wigan, Fryatt initially 350k rising to 700k and Hume the same rising to 500k, Mccarthy for 100k, Hughes 200k. They are all already worth more and will go on to be worth far more than we paid
TheHonourableOne Posted 7 March 2006 Posted 7 March 2006 Where is Willyums off to then? His 'boyhood' club apparantly, whoever that is...
davieG Posted 7 March 2006 Posted 7 March 2006 I would like to see someone justify Tim Davies on £250,000 / year + bonuses Ms Bucci on £100, 000 / year When the club is no more than an aspiring Championship play off team. These positions and salaries say one thing to me Premiership, they should be cutting the cloth at the top to match the shoddy clothing being produced.
Knighton Matt Posted 7 March 2006 Posted 7 March 2006 I would like to see someone justify Tim Davies on £250,000 / year + bonuses Ms Bucci on £100, 000 / year When the club is no more than an aspiring Championship play off team. These positions and salaries say one thing to me Premiership, they should be cutting the cloth at the top to match the shoddy clothing being produced. Agreed davieG utterly ridiculous salaries. What makes it worse is they probably pale in comparison to some of the rubbish we pay to players who sit in the reserves/treatment room.
Muz Posted 7 March 2006 Posted 7 March 2006 We dont need that many players I dont think. Weso and Sheehan will be two players who will cement there places in the side next season. The defence is fine , If we can keep hold of Stearman , just slot Sheehan at LB and keep Paddy Mac and Kisnorbo at CB's. With Joey leaving we do need another CM , Weso will be awesome next season , maybe him and Hughes in the middle. Get rid of Gareth Williams , bring in an attacking goalscoring midfielder. Maybe we could snap Welsh up for the left wing position , that would be ideal. Up front we are fine , Fryatt and Hume will set the league a-light next season. Get rid of Sylla replace him with Gradel - Sorted
shen Posted 7 March 2006 Posted 7 March 2006 the clubs also done some very good business imho, such as Connolly £3.5million to Wigan, Fryatt initially 350k rising to 700k and Hume the same rising to 500k, Mccarthy for 100k, Hughes 200k. They are all already worth more and will go on to be worth far more than we paid Ummm isn't it £2 million for Connolly rising to £3 mil, Fryatt potentially 850k and Hume potentially £1.1mil?
leicester1884 Posted 7 March 2006 Posted 7 March 2006 £300k for Hammond is bad business whichever way you look at it. Even more so when you consider we had plenty more time to judge his ability as will still had him on loan for three months when we paid the fee. Thanks once again Mr Levein.
leicester1884 Posted 7 March 2006 Posted 7 March 2006 I personally would still be against the Tigers ground share as I honestly don't believe it would of made that major of a difference to transfer budgets/contracts. It was always bound to end in tears at some stage anyhow As for the Birch, not bothered either way. Not my cup of Earl Grey but he's hardly a major drain on financial resoures in terms of running a club the size of LCFC.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.