bigneville Posted 26 August 2006 Share Posted 26 August 2006 Coca-Cola Championship Cardiff 5 13 Norwich 5 10 Crystal Palace 5 10 Birmingham 5 10 Wolverhampton 5 10 West Brom 4 8 Burnley 5 8 Plymouth 5 8 Southampton 5 7 Luton 5 7 Leicester 5 7 Coventry 5 7 Barnsley 5 7 Stoke 5 6 Preston 5 6 Southend 5 6 Sheff Wed 4 5 Derby 5 5 QPR 5 5 Leeds 4 4 Ipswich 5 4 Colchester 5 3 Hull 5 1 Sunderland 4 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molson Canadian Posted 26 August 2006 Share Posted 26 August 2006 MOVING ON UP !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The People's Hero Posted 26 August 2006 Share Posted 26 August 2006 Top half! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxhateram Posted 26 August 2006 Share Posted 26 August 2006 Coca-Cola Championship Cardiff 5 13 Norwich 5 10 Crystal Palace 5 10 Birmingham 5 10 Wolverhampton 5 10 West Brom 4 8 Burnley 5 8 Plymouth 5 8 Southampton 5 7 Luton 5 7 Leicester 5 7 Coventry 5 7 Barnsley 5 7 Stoke 5 6 Preston 5 6 Southend 5 6 Sheff Wed 4 5 Derby 5 5 QPR 5 5 Leeds 4 4 Ipswich 5 4 Colchester 5 3 Hull 5 1 Sunderland 4 0 wont we be fourteenth because of goal difference? so....... Coca-Cola Championship Cardiff 5 13 Norwich 5 10 Crystal Palace 5 10 Birmingham 5 10 Wolverhampton 5 10 West Brom 4 8 Burnley 5 8 Plymouth 5 8 Southampton 5 7 Luton 5 7 Coventry 5 7 Barnsley 5 7 Leicester 5 7 Stoke 5 6 Preston 5 6 Southend 5 6 Sheff Wed 4 5 Derby 5 5 QPR 5 5 Leeds 4 4 Ipswich 5 4 Colchester 5 3 Hull 5 1 Sunderland 4 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigneville Posted 26 August 2006 Author Share Posted 26 August 2006 wont we be fourteenth because of goal difference? so....... Coca-Cola Championship Cardiff 5 13 Norwich 5 10 Crystal Palace 5 10 Birmingham 5 10 Wolverhampton 5 10 West Brom 4 8 Burnley 5 8 Plymouth 5 8 Southampton 5 7 Luton 5 7 Coventry 5 7 Barnsley 5 7 Leicester 5 7 Stoke 5 6 Preston 5 6 Southend 5 6 Sheff Wed 4 5 Derby 5 5 QPR 5 5 Leeds 4 4 Ipswich 5 4 Colchester 5 3 Hull 5 1 Sunderland 4 0 No goaldifference is taken into account.... So we are 11th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexikokopops Posted 26 August 2006 Share Posted 26 August 2006 wont we be fourteenth because of goal difference? Did you take into account the changing Goal Difference of the other teams. Fr'instance Barnsley, who lost 5-1. The table post originally is correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxhateram Posted 26 August 2006 Share Posted 26 August 2006 No goaldifference is taken into account.... So we are 11th oh ok then wicked!!! i obviously did my maths wrong . well thats nice to hear top half and on our way, this is more like it!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigneville Posted 26 August 2006 Author Share Posted 26 August 2006 ' date='Aug 26 2006, 05:09 PM' post='383895']Did you take into account the changing Goal Difference of the other teams. Fr'instance Barnsley, who lost 5-1. The table post originally is correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babylon Posted 26 August 2006 Share Posted 26 August 2006 Probably our highest position for 2 years!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexikokopops Posted 26 August 2006 Share Posted 26 August 2006 Probably our highest position for 2 years!!! On that note I only found out today that before this season the last time Man Utd had topped the table was January 2004. My word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maybes Posted 26 August 2006 Share Posted 26 August 2006 However next game WBA away....not looking so good now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gist Posted 26 August 2006 Share Posted 26 August 2006 However next game WBA away....not looking so good now! You never know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bert Posted 26 August 2006 Share Posted 26 August 2006 However next game WBA away....not looking so good now! Aahhh the optism Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanTheFoxBhoy Posted 27 August 2006 Share Posted 27 August 2006 However next game WBA away....not looking so good now! It's good we got a win out of today, because next week we will get raped rather badly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mort Posted 27 August 2006 Share Posted 27 August 2006 It's good we got a win out of today, because next week we will get raped rather badly. You never know... we seem to have a knack for cocking it up against poor sides and then managing surprises against the bigger clubs, remember the Palace game last season. But on balance i think we'll have to do very well to get somthing out of the game... and then we have Brum away makes the Hull, Colchester, Hull and Sunderland games really impotant if we could win all four we'd be in a very strong position and I've no doubt we can do that... its just a matter of wether we will Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C-man Posted 27 August 2006 Share Posted 27 August 2006 It's good we got a win out of today, because next week we will get raped rather badly. Then we're lucky that we're not playing next weekend because England are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thracian Posted 27 August 2006 Share Posted 27 August 2006 The big problem for Kelly will be deciding whether to go "football" against West Brom or perceived "durability". We've got the team to win if we play it but there's no evidence that we will. Indeed, March 18 was the last time we won away (against Millwall) and since then we've lost three and drawn two - ie two points from 15. And, we've only scored two goals which explains why we don't win. We averaged less than a point a game throughout the whole of last season and in our last 25 games or 75 available points we've won just five and taken only 22 points so why we persist with "durability" instead of "win the ball then attack" is anyone's guess. I'd play: Henderson (he won't get replaced by Logan after a clean sheet), Stearman, McCarthy, Kisnorbo, Sheehan, Low, Hughes, Williams, Porter, Hume, O'Grady. Subs: Logan, Kenton, Wesolowski, Fryatt, Tiatto. In some ways I fancied Johnson because of his West Brom knowledge and Fryatt for his West Midlands connections but in the end I prefer a balanced team of in-form players and the extra foraging of Hume and O'Grady. I think that team would always be capable of scoring and is close to our best available. Only the questions of Henderson/Logan, Williams/Weso and Hume/Fryatt are too tight to call right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SydneyFC Posted 27 August 2006 Share Posted 27 August 2006 Watch out first place! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thracian Posted 27 August 2006 Share Posted 27 August 2006 It's good we got a win out of today, because next week we will get raped rather badly. That doesn't sound like an Aussie attitude. And talking of Aussies they've got to get passed Kisnorbo first and right now it doesn't look like even The Invisible Man would get by Kissa!. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.