Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
The Stig

The Foxestalk LCFC 11

Formation?  

90 members have voted

  1. 1. Which one do you want

    • 4-4-2
      14
    • 4-4-2 Attack
      25
    • 5-4-1
      1
    • 4-3-3
      20
    • 4-2-2-2
      2
    • 3-5-2
      19
    • 4-1-4-1
      0
    • 4-2-4
      3
    • 5-3-2
      4
    • Other (please state)
      2
  2. 2. Who do you want in goal

    • Paul Henderson
      33
    • Conrad Logan
      53
    • Robert Douglas
      4


Recommended Posts

4-2-4 :D

Logan

Stearman McAuley Kisnorbo Johansson

---------------Weso Tiatto-----------------

------------------Porter--------------------

----------Doods Hume Fryatt-------------

Adventurous, would probably lose several goals to nil though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4-3-3

--------------------Conrad-------------------

Stearman----Kisnorbo---McCauley--Johansson

Hughes------------Williams-----------Tiatto

Elvis----------------Hume---------------Porter

That should just about do it, give Porter a little more space to run at people, flanked by Elvis, Hume to link and get into position from anything from them or midfield or drop back and let Levi & Elvis run them ragged

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went for 'other'.

My 'other' formation would be 4-3-1-2

The '1' would be Ian Hume and my thinking is that the one between attack and midfield has the flexibility to support either the attacking two or the midfield three depending upon the state of play at the time. We could instantly become either a 4-4-2 or a 4-3-3. Don't f**k about with the defence - that's being f**ked about enough as it is!

Give the midfield some space and have a closer link to the front men. Keep the ball on the deck with shorter passes without the need to play hopeful (or hopeless) long balls to The Offsidernator!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went for 'other'.

My 'other' formation would be 4-3-1-2

The '1' would be Ian Hume and my thinking is that the one between attack and midfield has the flexibility to support either the attacking two or the midfield three depending upon the state of play at the time. We could instantly become either a 4-4-2 or a 4-3-3. Don't f**k about with the defence - that's being f**ked about enough as it is!

Give the midfield some space and have a closer link to the front men. Keep the ball on the deck with shorter passes without the need to play hopeful (or hopeless) long balls to The Offsidernator!

agreed. hume likes to drop deeper anyway and playing this formation means the attacking threat will be maintained while helping out our rather poor midfield when appropriate.

will it happen? probably not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A boring 442 attacking formation with Logan in goal, who has done tremendously in football since winning the eurovision 9 times with Ireland :rolleyes:

All we then need is the 11 players to fill the gaps.

:(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...