JoeyB Posted 24 March 2007 Posted 24 March 2007 2) Why? You got something against poofters? Nope not really!
Jon the Hat Posted 24 March 2007 Posted 24 March 2007 FFS. Leicester and England. Why me? It just isn't fair.
PAULCFC Posted 24 March 2007 Posted 24 March 2007 It's times like this that i'm thankfull that i got off the sky tv bandwagon.
Master Fox Posted 24 March 2007 Posted 24 March 2007 FFS. Leicester and England. Why me? It just isn't fair. It's the hat, time for change perhaps?
Daggers Posted 24 March 2007 Posted 24 March 2007 Voy a ser de Colombia...they know what to do with shit managers and players
lookwhaticando Posted 24 March 2007 Posted 24 March 2007 I've just noticed that the BBC is a bit too soft when it comes to the national team. Instead of calling it a toothless performance... why not call it a wank one? <player> was lackluster? Why not something like <player> is a lazy overpaid workshy feckwad? ------------ *wrestles topic back on track* ------------ There's something wrong with the England set up... with all those free-scoring, dynamic attacking players, you'd think we'd muster more than one goal every five games... Gerrard, Lampard, Rooney, Johnson all score plenty of goals in domestic competitions for their respective clubs, yet when you put them on a pitch together they fire more blanks than the Territorials. McClaren OUT! At least Sven's men would score once in a while...
Master Fox Posted 24 March 2007 Posted 24 March 2007 They're gay Well maybe so, they dress nice and are very organised?
lildave3 Posted 24 March 2007 Posted 24 March 2007 Is it just me or does Gerrard not look as energetic for England as he does for Liverpool? Same with Lampard.
Leicfox Posted 24 March 2007 Posted 24 March 2007 You can't say poofters, its not politically correct these days.... Dave and his gang like to be called Gays.
Daggers Posted 24 March 2007 Posted 24 March 2007 You can't say poofters, its not politically correct these days.... Dave and his gang like to be called Gays. Oooh...get her
Master Fox Posted 24 March 2007 Posted 24 March 2007 You can't say poofters, its not politically correct these days.... Dave and his gang like to be called Gays. Cheerful, good-humoured, and frolicsome. All ladies welcome of course
lcfc_jme Posted 24 March 2007 Posted 24 March 2007 Is it just me or does Gerrard not look as energetic for England as he does for Liverpool? Same with Lampard. I notice the same thing every time I watch them play for England. They seem lazier and have less influence on the game. At least Fat Frank is as consistently wasteful for England as he is for Chelsea though. The pair of them aren't suited to playing in the same midfield as each other.
lildave3 Posted 24 March 2007 Posted 24 March 2007 I notice the same thing every time I watch them play for England. They seem lazier and have less influence on the game. At least Fat Frank is as consistently wasteful for England as he is for Chelsea though. The pair of them aren't suited to playing in the same midfield as each other. Please don't turn this into a Lamps slagging off thread.
Master Fox Posted 24 March 2007 Posted 24 March 2007 Please don't turn this into a Lamps slagging off thread. Yeah, we like lamps Personal Favourite
lcfc_jme Posted 24 March 2007 Posted 24 March 2007 Please don't turn this into a Lamps slagging off thread. OK then I apologise, but I'm right in what I'm saying. His goalscoring record is pretty good for a midfield player, but if he were a striker he'd be lambasted because he wastes so many chances with pathetic efforts that never look like going in. Gerrard is nowhere near as influential for England as he is for Liverpool. He doesn't seem to have the same desire to get into the game and when he's on the ball, he isn't all that effective with it. Just looks out of place when playing for England imo.
Leicfox Posted 24 March 2007 Posted 24 March 2007 Please don't turn this into a Lamps slagging off thread. I thought he should of done better 1st half when going through and although he was pressured by the defender im 100% certain Andy Johnson would have scored that.
dandannieldanok Posted 24 March 2007 Posted 24 March 2007 Oh well we didn't win and we are making it difficult for ourselves. We will qualify though, we always do.
00rawat Posted 24 March 2007 Posted 24 March 2007 FFS. Leicester and England. Why me? It just isn't fair. That is what I was thinking. Who ever I support keep pouring poor performance one after the other.
BartonFox Posted 24 March 2007 Posted 24 March 2007 :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Just in case you haven't seen the updated groups, Scotland are top of theirs Our group has the World Cup winners and runner-up in it and also a team that made the last 8 of the World Cup
lildave3 Posted 24 March 2007 Posted 24 March 2007 Oh well we didn't win and we are making it difficult for ourselves. We will qualify though, we always do. 1994
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.