lildave3 Posted 8 April 2007 Posted 8 April 2007 Yeah, i'd say we're not going to win this one. KP was fantastic though.
Matt Posted 8 April 2007 Posted 8 April 2007 FFS! Nixon got six, Tried to do it again and got caught out. Just start fooking bowling now!
Maybes Posted 8 April 2007 Posted 8 April 2007 Absolute shower of shite. England are terrible. Michael Vaughan is crap at batting. The last 20 overs were a disgrace with only 3 boundaries
Flynny Posted 8 April 2007 Posted 8 April 2007 England are terrible. Michael Vaughan is crap at batting. The last 20 overs were a disgrace with only 3 boundaries I was hoping Strauss would do well, which makes Vaughan just about droppable. Now if they're going to drop him they'll have to go back to Flintoff cap in hand and ask him to captain.
Milky Posted 8 April 2007 Posted 8 April 2007 England are terrible. Michael Vaughan is crap at batting. The last 20 overs were a disgrace with only 3 boundaries The game changed with that twat umpire getting in the way. It meant 1 instead of 4, and Bell got out next ball. Bloody typical, another flukey turning point. At that point we were cruising, absolutely crusing and heading for over 300. give some credit to Aus for the bowling late on. KP played for himself in the end, we really needed him to kick on, but he was happy taking the singles to get his 100.
Maybes Posted 8 April 2007 Posted 8 April 2007 I would suggest the batting order for the next game to go something like this. 1. Bell 2. Flintoff (Then he will have enough time to bat and will have a licence to play his natural game) 3. Pieterson 4. Struass 5. Collingwood 6. Vaughen 7. Bopara 8. Nixon 9. Mahmood 10. Anderson 11. Panesar
Simi Posted 8 April 2007 Posted 8 April 2007 I would suggest the batting order for the next game to go something like this.1. Bell 2. Flintoff (Then he will have enough time to bat and will have a licence to play his natural game) 3. Pieterson 4. Struass 5. Collingwood 6. Vaughen 7. Bopara 8. Nixon 9. Mahmood 10. Anderson 11. Panesar Vaghan should move down the order I agree. Nixon has dropped Gilchrist. Sure to prove costly.
Matt Posted 8 April 2007 Posted 8 April 2007 Fina-fukin-ly! Collingwood caught Gilchrist. 57-1, now lets get a few more out and QUICK!
Joe. Posted 8 April 2007 Posted 8 April 2007 We need Hayden gone. He's the one who can really do the damage.... It's so annoying that they have so many good batsmen. <_<
Brainy Posted 8 April 2007 Author Posted 8 April 2007 At least they can get to 50 without lossing a wicket. Tossers.
filbertway Posted 8 April 2007 Posted 8 April 2007 The game changed with that twat umpire getting in the way. It meant 1 instead of 4, and Bell got out next ball. Bloody typical, another flukey turning point. At that point we were cruising, absolutely crusing and heading for over 300.give some credit to Aus for the bowling late on. KP played for himself in the end, we really needed him to kick on, but he was happy taking the singles to get his 100. To be fair, they did drop KP twice before that.
Flynny Posted 8 April 2007 Posted 8 April 2007 We need to get the required rate climbing, because that total's easy to chase down and they're not going to be tempted into silly shots. Don't see us winning at all. Aussies'll win by 6-7 wickets or so.
Joe. Posted 8 April 2007 Posted 8 April 2007 God our batting was poor Only KP, Bell and Bopara did anything. Yet again, Vaughan not proving his worth in the side....
Flynny Posted 8 April 2007 Posted 8 April 2007 Required rate's up to 5.6, Hayden's not long gone and they've not scored a boundary for 5 overs. Looking better. We'll still lose. Australia can't possibly finish as badly as we did.
Matt Posted 8 April 2007 Posted 8 April 2007 Its all shudda/cudda and it makes no difference its 103-2 and nothings gonna change it, BUT we have had 3 more than fair LBW shouts, and we should hae ran out 2 of the aussie players! Along with the umpire getting in the way of a Bell shot. The umpires are screwing us!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.