Tomassi Posted 12 February 2005 Author Posted 12 February 2005 Cockov how immature <_< I prefer Prickov 65811[/snapback]
Shauno45 Posted 12 February 2005 Posted 12 February 2005 id av him bak, hes a good player, scores goals
Tomassi Posted 12 February 2005 Author Posted 12 February 2005 its Prickov Tomassi get it right <_< 65829[/snapback]
Matt Posted 12 February 2005 Posted 12 February 2005 id av him bak, hes a good player, scores goals 65827[/snapback] Damn...isn't there a yawning smilie? because i'm getting sick of saying this, I personally am not slagging his work effort or his goal scoriinnng record, he was brilliant for us and i'm not taking any of that away from him, he was my favorite player and I had alot of respect for him, but all that respect was lost when he left, the way he left, I don't expect him to tell the truth and say "oh yeah i'm leaving" and when the Birch asked him on the last day of the season he was in a dodgy situation and I understand that but the day before he left without ever being asked(And no-one seems to be picking up on this so i've put it in bold) he said on live tv "I am loving it at Leicester and i'll be definetly be helping Leicester get promoted. And when Leicester meet Paul Dickhead again, well I hope he's prepared because he currently doesn't know the meaning of hell!
Matt Posted 12 February 2005 Posted 12 February 2005 bet hes brickin it 65853[/snapback] Hopefully....
Tomassi Posted 12 February 2005 Author Posted 12 February 2005 nackburn 3-0 blorich 65822[/snapback] nackburn not nlackburn
Tomassi Posted 12 February 2005 Author Posted 12 February 2005 now this thread doesnt make any sense cus sum t w a t has joined it with another thread
Shauno45 Posted 12 February 2005 Posted 12 February 2005 i agree he deserves what he gets if he comes bak, i just think we miss the determination, effort and goals he gave us. btw how did he leave us was it a relegation clause? we get any money out of it?
Mark Posted 12 February 2005 Posted 12 February 2005 Because their was two topics about Dickov scoring, and does he really deserve that?
Tomassi Posted 12 February 2005 Author Posted 12 February 2005 Because their was two topics about Dickov scoring, and does he really deserve that? 65875[/snapback] but they were 2 totally different goals..
filbertway Posted 12 February 2005 Posted 12 February 2005 So its only me that still likes dickov?????
Craig Posted 12 February 2005 Posted 12 February 2005 DICKOV!! THERE'S ONLY ONE DICKOV!! Well done little fella!
Bedford Fox Posted 12 February 2005 Posted 12 February 2005 DICKOV!! THERE'S ONLY ONE DICKOV!! AGREED! What a legend and good luck to him whoever he plays for!
Guest Daniel Posted 12 February 2005 Posted 12 February 2005 Dickov, there's only one Dickov. Brilliant Paul, well done.
City Fan Posted 12 February 2005 Posted 12 February 2005 There's only one reason we went straight back into the premiership when we were last in this division, and only one reason why we battled to the end in the premiership last season...... THERE'S ONLY ONE PAUL DICKOV! ONE PAUL DICKOV!!!!
Mark Posted 12 February 2005 Posted 12 February 2005 There's only one reason we went straight back into the premiership when we were last in this division 65964[/snapback] Sorry to dissapoint you but that would be Muzzy, without his flair and the amount of goals he created, for Dickov, no way would we have bounced straight back.
Bedford Fox Posted 12 February 2005 Posted 12 February 2005 agreed muzzy creative skills were key but without dickov where woulds the goals come from? So they were both key reasons take them out and you have a mid table championship LCFC! like this year!!!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.