scrivins2 Posted 13 July 2007 Posted 13 July 2007 More successful, less successful, similar? What is your opinion on the matter.
Kent Fox Posted 13 July 2007 Posted 13 July 2007 More successful, less successful, similar?What is your opinion on the matter. They will not be more or less successful, but they will have shed loads more money. There will undoubtedly be a greatest hits album - unfortunately And we will have to put up with seeing the daft tarts for weeks whilst promoting the tour. I used to live in Kirby - a very long time ago. Used to be nice. Is it still?
Pete_foxes Posted 13 July 2007 Posted 13 July 2007 Less successful, unless the re invent themselves as more mainstream. There getting older, I don't think they can be the energetic queens of pop that they once were.
Nationwider Posted 13 July 2007 Posted 13 July 2007 I can't see them selling out stadia like Take That have done. I'm not sure who their market is now anyway. Probably just Richard Madeley and Gary Bushall. It'll be a horribly undignified flashback, only with added cellulite and stretch marks.
Unabomber Posted 13 July 2007 Posted 13 July 2007 I think its just a publicity thing, once people have realised that it is just a publicity stunt, and that they are actually trying to sing people will generally loose interest. I just can't really understand why they are bothering to get back together, just my personal opinion.
Raj Posted 13 July 2007 Posted 13 July 2007 They were lucky last time with all that girl power bollox NO ONE is going to fall for it again.....are they???
David O'Leary Posted 14 July 2007 Posted 14 July 2007 More successful, less successful, similar?What is your opinion on the matter. hopefully not
Webbo Posted 14 July 2007 Posted 14 July 2007 I'd still boink Ginger.(as long as I could wear earphones).
Daggers Posted 14 July 2007 Posted 14 July 2007 I'd still boink Ginger.(as long as I could wear earphones). So would I. I don't do sloppies though so I'm going to have to go first, if that's OK?
Wils Posted 14 July 2007 Posted 14 July 2007 Never going to be as big as they were when they first came around.
Milky Posted 14 July 2007 Posted 14 July 2007 I always fancied Scary. same here, well sexy. Posh has always been number 1 though.
Wils Posted 14 July 2007 Posted 14 July 2007 same here, well sexy. Posh has always been number 1 though. Were on the same wave length.
Milky Posted 14 July 2007 Posted 14 July 2007 Were on the same wave length. we may differ on 3rd though, i've never really been a baby fan, so i'm inclined to say ginger. Only when she has some meat on her mind.
Wils Posted 14 July 2007 Posted 14 July 2007 we may differ on 3rd though, i've never really been a baby fan, so i'm inclined to say ginger. Only when she has some meat on her mind. 1.Posh 2.Scary 3.Ginger 4.Baby 5.Sporty.
Webbo Posted 14 July 2007 Posted 14 July 2007 So would I.I don't do sloppies though so I'm going to have to go first, if that's OK? I think that'd be best, she wouldn't feel you after me.
Tevez Posted 14 July 2007 Posted 14 July 2007 Spice Girls are over rated, the only best come back band are Take-That.
Fez of Mahrez Posted 15 July 2007 Posted 15 July 2007 I was only 12 when they were around the first time so I didn't really know what they were offering me but I'm sure they'd be successful if they tried me again, now I'm a man of the world who is open to all sorts of exciting offers.
Daggers Posted 15 July 2007 Posted 15 July 2007 I think that'd be best, she wouldn't feel you after me. No, you misunderstand, she would be a willing participant...there's no need for you to be using your usual roofies and chloroform for this gig.
Webbo Posted 15 July 2007 Posted 15 July 2007 No, you misunderstand, she would be a willing participant...there's no need for you to be using your usual roofies and chloroform for this gig. Ooh, your so sharp, you'll cut yourself.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.