Flynny Posted 11 October 2007 Posted 11 October 2007 He's a nasty piece of work. Nice one. You've basically done the equivalent of batting a dog in the face until it snarls and then crying foul. I wish I could think of a better analogy, I suppose this is a tribute of sorts.
The People's Hero Posted 11 October 2007 Posted 11 October 2007 Nice one. You've basically done the equivalent of batting a dog in the face until it snarls and then crying foul.I wish I could think of a better analogy, I suppose this is a tribute of sorts. I've said all I've got to say on the matter.
Finnegan Posted 11 October 2007 Posted 11 October 2007 I've said all I've got to say on the matter. Twice. At least.
Ultra Posted 11 October 2007 Posted 11 October 2007 Indictment!I stand by my comment. I've never been one for starting trouble. But if you are vile enough to gob on people you shouldn't be surprised if they wipe it in your face. Indeed. Maybe you could get him to explain which house rule you've broken to warrant a ban.
Bryn Posted 11 October 2007 Posted 11 October 2007 I know I've not been here that long but I know this place would be fooking weird without Thracian, he's part of the entertainment.
Sods Posted 11 October 2007 Posted 11 October 2007 I find thracian alright to be honest. I quite like The peoples hero and pablo manwells comedy towards him.
Finnegan Posted 11 October 2007 Posted 11 October 2007 I know I've not been here that long but I know this place would be fooking weird without Thracian, he's part of the entertainment. What? Sorry? Did you say something? I was busy staring at your sig.
DanTheFoxBhoy Posted 12 October 2007 Posted 12 October 2007 Geo! You ruined my sexual innuendo with your squabbling! The gloves are off, chump
Lillehamring Posted 12 October 2007 Posted 12 October 2007 Oh I agree completley, thats not in dispute.And some of the things he's said to your are pretty low, probabley worse than your pedo jibes at him as it's quite clear they're in jest and his are direct attacks on you. But this forums is just one big arguement at the moment. hmmm, this is a very dangerous attitude to take - calling someone an underachiever, i would hope, should act as an incentive to suceed, something i have no doubt TPH has the capacity to do with his ventures; to accuse someone of unthinkable sexual deviancy, however, in the social climate that we live in these days, is irresponsible and utterly inappropriate. to find humour in such contumely is, frankly, a little disturbing.
Manwell Pablo Posted 12 October 2007 Posted 12 October 2007 hmmm, this is a very dangerous attitude to take - calling someone an underachiever, i would hope, should act as an incentive to suceed, something i have no doubt TPH has the capacity to do with his ventures; to accuse someone of unthinkable sexual deviancy, however, in the social climate that we live in these days, is irresponsible and utterly inappropriate. to find humour in such contumely is, frankly, a little disturbing. It's a jibe at the fact he takes such a keen interest in anything brought through our academy, everyone knows it's a joke not a serious alligation, if it was I admit it would be worse.
Geo V Posted 12 October 2007 Posted 12 October 2007 Geo! You ruined my sexual innuendo with your squabbling!The gloves are off, chump Thats it, time for a Dan vs Geo thread
The People's Hero Posted 12 October 2007 Posted 12 October 2007 I wonder how many posts I've had deleted this week.
.png.0e7438f54a80a2f2566907f77fd7a32a.thumb.png.0ea5e31693d284629c473304eabd4568.png)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.